In response to the background info regarding the Vor'cha class model being "heavily modified to create the Klingon attack crusier in TNG: "All Good Things...", an anonymous IP user had this to say:
- Not Correct, the Future Cruiser was a newly desiged and built ship,also designed by Rick Sternbach, not the Vor'Cha. --User:64.12.117.10 02:38, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)
--From Andoria with Love 02:45, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Unity
What role did the Vor'cha class play in "Unity"? Was it assimilated by the Borg? Valley Forge 16:28, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Nacelles
- "It is of note that this is the first Klingon ship to demonstrate the use of Federation style warp nacelle technology and placement."
This statement does not make sense to me. The nacelles barely look more like Federation style than the K't'inga class and D7 class, and look almost the same as the Raptor class, and the location is the same as that used on the Raptor, D5 class, D7 class, and K't'inga class. In fact, the only klingon warships not to use this location that I can think of are the Bird-of-preys. Given this, does that quotes statement make sense? --OuroborosCobra 01:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Separable Command Section
The Ertl model of this ship featured a command section that could separate from the main body in a similar manner to the galaxy class Enterprise. While this ability was never seen on screen I think I remeber reeading somewhere that it was the intention of the designers that the forward section would detach in battle situtuations. No idea where I read this unfortunately but is it worth a mention with regard to the ertl model?
Images of disruptor cannons
As you may have noticed, I renamed the first image in the "Tactical systems" section to note that it is a disruptor cannon, and not a torpedo tube, as previously indicated. The episode clearly indicates that they were firing a disruptor in that image, not a torpedo. Rogue Vulcan 23:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC)