Talk:Unnamed Federation starships (24th century)

Millennium Falcon

I expect to soon see a "Are we sure this is the millennium falcon?" here; I believe this is, and the TrekBBS had a forum on it with a pic of the lighting changed and from a frame or two later where you can see that little cylindric-shooter part on the side a little better. ([1]) - AJ Halliwell 00:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

While I may be more optimistic, keep his link and this info in mind if you have second thoughts about the Millennium Falcon.--Tim Thomason 01:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Visual confirmation aside, is there a source for the current claim on the page that says John Knoll specifically put the Millennium Falcon in the film? — Scott (talk) 20:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I can't find a source online, so I've made it more vague. There are plenty of old message boards and stuff that shows that this possible "misconception" predates its inclusion on Memory Alpha.--Tim Thomason 05:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Tim! However, I feel that the claim still needs a source. Such ambiguity is hardly encyclopedic. — Scott (talk) 15:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

"Cylindrical ship at the Battle of Sector 001": Why is the Millenium Falcon described as a "Cylindrical ship". It hardly looks cylindrical. --GDK (talk) 07:33, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Federation merchant vessel: deciphering the text

When this ship is attacked, it appears on a screen in Sisko's runabout with some text nearby. I think I recognized a U.S.S., but nothing more. Could someone upload the relevant graphic and perhaps someone decipher it? Kennelly 22:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

is this what you are referring to? i can't make any of the text out and that's as good as i could get it... Deevolution 22:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

<dead link removed>

Or this?

Neither of which are very legible. --Alan del Beccio 22:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

removed ds9:tm sourced ships

Removed:

Three-nacelled Excelsior refit variant

This unnamed Federation starship was involved in the Dominion War in 2374. (DS9 Season 6)

This ship was a rough-build combination of an Excelsior-refit class parts with two nacelles attached like on normal Excelsior-class ships, and a third connected at the bottom of the saucer with a Constitution-class nacelled pylon. No name or registry was assigned to this model. The only data about this model comes from the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual, though the picture shown in the manual is incorrect.

Two-nacelled Constitution refit variant

This unnamed Federation starship was involved in the Dominion War in 2374. (DS9 Season 6)

This ship was a rough-build combination of Star Trek movies-era Enterprise parts with two nacelles attached at the bottom of the saucer connector. No name or registry was assigned to this model. The only data about this model comes from the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual.

These were both basically here on assumption. Without further evidence, visual or otherwise, they shouldn't be in the main article. --Alan (talk) 22:42, May 7, 2019 (UTC)

As this content was removed from the page, I removed the Request for Images. Ex Astris Scientia has some behind the scenes images of the models from Dan Curry - but it doesn't look like they actually appeared on screen. - AJ Halliwell (talk) 15:52, June 12, 2020 (UTC)

Longboy Excelsior from Qualor II junkyard

Regarding the Excelsior concept model that shows up in "Unification I", behind the scenes photos of the model published in the Official Starships Collection issue on it show that it says "USS Excesior NCC-0220" on the saucer. Shouldn't this be enough to move it to its own page under that name, bearing in mind USS Alka-Selsior... – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hunter12396 (talk • contribs).

Are you're talking about the original studio/study model? --Alan (talk) 21:22, September 9, 2020 (UTC)

Yes Hunter12396 (talk) 22:04, September 9, 2020 (UTC)

Douglas Station ships

The section on Douglas Station lists three unknown types, but from the images it looks like types 1 and 3 might actually be the same, just flipped. Should that possibility be mentioned? JeruTz (talk) 14:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)