Talk: USS Relativity

Revision as of 21:42, 2 February 2005

If Starfleet intended there to be more than one vessel bearing that registration number, wouldn't it be logical to start at NCV-474439-A, and work up?

Can't we assume that Starfleet hadn't intended for there to be more than one Enterprise NCC-1701, that it was only because of Kirk that the another got created.

Or am I talking nonsense? - Rob 00:15 9th May 04 (BST)

It is one possible explanation, it as it is never mentioned on screen, we can't list it. -- Redge | Talk 20:26, 14 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Is this vessel the USS Relativity? Surely, as a timeship, it should be the UTS Relativity? -- MiChaos 18:57, 14 Aug 2004 (CEST)

The Aeon doesn't have a prefix at all. Whichever is mentioned on screen. -- Redge | Talk 20:26, 14 Aug 2004 (CEST)

The Aeon is marked on Memory Alpha as the UTS Aeon, so I'm assuming it'd be the same for the Relativity and the Wells -- MiChaos 20:55, 14 Aug 2004 (CEST)

The Relativity, on the other hand, has a dedication plaque. And it says USS. And where on MA does the Aeon have the UTS prefix? I found only one reference, and since it's incorrect, I removed it. See Talk:Aeon. -- Michael Warren | Talk 21:06, Aug 14, 2004 (CEST)

The only reference I can find at the moment is the UTS Aeon page itself. I've just checked that page, and the only thing which linked to it was a the talk page on Future's End, Part I. I'll add the UTS Aeon page on the immediate deletion page, and creep back into my dunces corner... I thought there were other references, but obviously I was wrong. Sorry -- MiChaos 23:23, 14 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Note:Link to UTS Aeon removed. -- Cid Highwind 15:23, 17 Aug 2004 (CEST)

U.S.S. Relativity dedication plaque

(Moved from User talk:Gvsualan]] If you watch the actual VOY episode, you will see the live shot of the dedication plate. The quote is... "The only reason for time is so everything doesn't happen ALL at once."

Also, the quote is NOT from Albert Einstein, which is obvious by reading the dedication plate. I did make a change to the page, but you reverted it. Maybe you want to have a look at the episode and rethink your reversion? I won't change it back, but you should check it out. You'll see what I'm talking about. -- Mahkie Mahk

My only comment is that (a) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one personally "barked at" for the change and (b) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one personally "barked at" for the change. --Gvsualan 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)

Actually, Mahkie Mahk was quite civil in his original post - there's no need to change the tone of this discussion, OK? Looking at the article history, DarkHorizon changed that quote earlier. In fact, that quote originally was from Albert Einstein. However, it was also used in "Buckaroo Banzai" made by "E.M. Rauch", and this, if correct, wouldn't be the first reference to Buckaroo Banzai in Trek's history. I think we should revert this to the "E.M. Rauch"-version (if it was indeed on-screen, could someone double-check just to be sure?) and add a small note about the origin of that quote. -- Cid Highwind 22:42, 2005 Feb 2 (CET)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'':The following belongs here on '''this''' page --''
-== U.S.S. Relativity ==
-If you watch the actual VOY episode, you will see the live shot of the dedication plate. The quote is... "The only reason for time is so everything doesn't happen ALL at once."
-Also, the quote is NOT from Albert Einstein, which is obvious by reading the dedication plate. I did make a change to the page, but you reverted it. Maybe you want to have a look at the episode and rethink your reversion? I won't change it back, but you should check it out. You'll see what I'm talking about. -- [[User:24.218.219.227|Mahkie Mahk]]
-* My only comment is that (a) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one ''personally'' "barked at" for the change and (b) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one ''personally'' "barked at" for the change. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)
-----
 If Starfleet intended there to be more than one vessel bearing that registration number, wouldn't it be logical to start at NCV-474439-A, and work up?
@@ Line 28: / Line 18: @@
 ::''Note:Link to ''UTS Aeon'' removed.'' -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 15:23, 17 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+== U.S.S. Relativity dedication plaque==
+(''Moved from User talk:Gvsualan]]
+If you watch the actual VOY episode, you will see the live shot of the dedication plate. The quote is... "The only reason for time is so everything doesn't happen ALL at once."
+Also, the quote is NOT from Albert Einstein, which is obvious by reading the dedication plate. I did make a change to the page, but you reverted it. Maybe you want to have a look at the episode and rethink your reversion? I won't change it back, but you should check it out. You'll see what I'm talking about. -- [[User:24.218.219.227|Mahkie Mahk]]
+:My only comment is that (a) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one ''personally'' "barked at" for the change and (b) it was reverted for the same reason before, so I shouldn't be the one ''personally'' "barked at" for the change. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 22:25, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)
+::Actually, Mahkie Mahk was quite civil in his original post - there's no need to change the tone of this discussion, OK? Looking at the article history, DarkHorizon changed that quote earlier. In fact, that quote originally ''was'' from Albert Einstein. However, it was also used in "Buckaroo Banzai" made by "E.M. Rauch", and this, if correct, wouldn't be the first reference to Buckaroo Banzai in Trek's history. I think we should revert this to the "E.M. Rauch"-version (if it was indeed on-screen, could someone double-check just to be sure?) and add a small note about the origin of that quote. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 22:42, 2005 Feb 2 (CET)