Contents 1 USS Melbourne 2 About Klingons at Wolf 359 3 Constitution refit 4 Out of curiosity 5 39 out of 40 ships.. Which one survived? 6 3 Lists

USS MelbourneEdit

What's our stance on the two Melbournes? How/why were both there? My assumption (based on the additional presence of 'prototype' ships and a Constitution) is that ships at Utopia Planetia or another shipyard, in the process of decomissioning, were yanked from their scrapyard and pressed into service. Obviously, this is non-canon, so I haven't really stated it in specifics. -- DarkHorizon 13:48, 5 Jan 2004 (PST)

Strictly canonically speaking, the proto-Nebula Melbourne was neither named or really seen. I think the only really canon vessel is the Excelsior Melbourne, right? Or was there ever any really obvious evidence (as in: clear to the average viewer) to suggest otherwise? -- Harry 06:42, 6 Jan 2004 (PST)

About Klingons at Wolf 359Edit

I decided to place this here because I honestly think there were no Klingons in Wolf 359, dispite what "Unity" says. I have asked numerous people (Including one who knows tons of Trek data by heart, he even has rememerized power output numbers of different phasers) and they all say there were no Klingons at Wolf 359. I even checked Ex-Astris-Scientia's huge article on Wolf 359 and saw not one reference to Klingons, only '39 Federation ships'. Enzo Aquarius 17:30, 27 Dec 2004 (CET)

I don't believe there were Klingons at Wolf 359, either. None were seen and none were mentioned. Maybe Klingon ships were destroyed by the Borg on their way to Earth, but there was no reference to them being at the battle itself. AJHayson

Not that this would be definitive proof that they made it to the battle, but didn't Admiral Hanson say something along the lines of "the Klingons are sending a few ships too". There isn't proof either way that Klingon ships ended up being involved, but I'm fairly sure Unity isn't the only reference to it. --Pearse 20:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Didn't he say either that he wouldn't be sure that they would make it right in time? : [defchris] :: ^{[ talk ]} : 00:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Constitution refit Edit

What is this evidence on the Constitution refit? If none can be provided, it should be removed. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 13:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

here [1] --Shisma 14:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Out of curiosity Edit

Would photos taken at Star Trek The Adventure be considered a reliable source for the ships lost at Wolf 359? If so, I have a few I can upload from a display that listed all 39 of the Federation's losses. (http://www.treknation.com/reviews/star_trek_the_adventure_review.shtml)

No, not canon. --Alan 22:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

39 out of 40 ships.. Which one survived?Edit

Self-explanatory. Anyone have a reference for this? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.125.76.216 (talk).

No, it was never stated which one it was. The background section has more info on this. - Archduk3 03:03, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

3 ListsEdit

Wondering why there are three lists and why they haven't been merged into one list. If they are broken up for ease of how they are referenced, wouldn't two lists be better...one for the ones seen onscreen, the second with each ship and how it is referenced? That or just one large list with the comments after. Just curious is all. Leobold1 03:14, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

The reason is our POV and canon policies. The first list is strictly canon, the second has info from non-canon sources while the third is from the books and comics. - Archduk3 09:25, December 7, 2010 (UTC)