revision issues[]
A number of issues with your revisions: 1) There is no Best Buy article... seems unnecessary to me so no link was req'd 2) Your Amazon link refers to the rain forest, not the retailer 3) There should be a Medical Division article created to reflect the new film's nomenclature. Read the package pls. 4) Why did you delete the pic then overwrite my new version with the old pic? Baffling. --Darth Duranium 08:28, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
- 1 - Just because there is no article yet doesn't mean you shouldn't link there, that's how article are created.
- 2 - Fixed.
- 3 - No, there should not. That was never seen on screen, so there shouldn't be an article. The redirect is only for people confused by the poor labeling of these products.
- 4 - It is the same exact thing. The real question is, why would you upload the exact same image to a different file name? That's what's baffling. - Archduk3 08:32, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
1)& 2) Who'd bother writing that for a Star Trek site? 3) That's opinion, based on past canon. Those insignia are seen onscreen. 4) Whatever. It was gone, almost instantly. You know what you did was uncool and it's not the first time. But hey, go right on doing what you do... I'll leave all of your important contributions as they are. --Darth Duranium 10:10, February 8, 2011 (UTC)