Removed Edit

Some of the facts could be called into question since she was involved in a very detailed hallucination when the data was shown. This could explain why the stardate indicates he was only seven years old at the time of the episode.

As with most things in star trek it will work just fine. His species could be very fast lived. — Morder (talk) 22:04, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

The seven years old part should be struck as speculation, but if we have no way to know outside of this hallucination if this is a real planet, we may want to note that.--31dot 22:21, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Actually, If it's unknown we don't mention it per policy :) — Morder (talk) 22:40, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Point taken. :) I guess I saw a difference between stating if something is unknown vs. stating that it is unknown if something is unknown. It's not a big deal to me, though.--31dot 22:50, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

I still think we should mention somewhere that this was only in a hallucination, because that's a fact. We can let readers draw their own conclusions from that. Something like "...that Deanna Troi was studying as part of a hallucination".– Cleanse ^{( talk | contribs )} 02:27, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Good point and that fits well. — Morder (talk) 02:48, December 15, 2009 (UTC)