Memory Alpha

Talk:Patricia Tallman

36,849pages on
this wiki

Back to page

FA status Edit

Nomination (21 June - 02 July 2008, Success) Edit

Like I said on the "peer review" page I want to nominate this article for a featured article. I've worked on it and changed it from a stub like article to one which covers Pat Tallman and her Star Trek connections completely. The peer review was left without comments so here is the nomination. – Tom 08:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Support, with minor concerns - Well-written and constructed (I contributed some minor details to the article). My only concern is that her actual work on Star Trek is only a single paragraph in the prose. This perhaps could be expanded, but is not an obstacle for my support - the article is strong as-is. -- Michael Warren | Talk 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - I would agree with Michael, although this would not stop me from supporting its application for FA. TrekFan 15:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support, also with minor concerns - Michael, I know exactly where you're coming from. Her career in other roles other than Trek take up a lot of space, and IMHO it's not all too necessary - although every other actor/stunt on MA has a background career on their pages as well. But for checking all the connections would definitely have taken a while, I know what it's like sifting through hundreds of pages looking for the right information. Dave 02:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - Come on, guys! We only need two more votes to secure an FA! TrekFan 00:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - This is another one that I would not have known that she played so many characters. Great job! ---- Willie LLAP 00:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Not very often you see such an informative and well written article for an actress who has played many non-primary characters. Definitely worthy of FA status. Melak talk 18:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Archived.– Cleanse 10:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Reconfirmation (11 Apr - 01 May, Success) Edit

A FA from 2005. It still seems well written and comprehensive to me, and I think its status should continue. 31dot 10:24, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

  • Support. - Archduk3 17:25, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support. As a main contributor to this article I would be delighted about a reconfirmation as featured article. I am updating the article frequently. Tom 19:16, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Peer review Edit

I want to include this article in the featured articles list. I expanded this article from an article with a few pictures, three stub sentences and I think two external links and I think it deserves a featured status. Useful comments and contrubutions are really appreciated. – Tom 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki