Name source?Edit

does this species name have a source? or is it a creation of ma? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.139.1.139 (talk).

It's what the character was called in the credits in various official works such as press releases and the Star Trek: Voyager Companion. That means it was also what he was called in the script. --From Andoria with Love 16:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree that this is what it should be called if it was called so in the script and other official sources, but somehow it just seems...silly. :) -- TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 16:59, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

Star Trek as a whole is pretty silly. And please stop responding to 3+ year old comments. -- sulfur 17:07, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

What is your problem? Why does it matter if I want to respond to a comment I have seen on a talk page? To me it's still relevant whether it's a week old or a year old. If you don't like it, please don't respond to my comment. From what I've noticed, I think you may need some lessons in how to talk to people on here, but that's just my opinion. -- TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 17:14, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

And I think that you might need to check what exactly the purpose of these talk pages is (Hint: It's not "general discussion"). -- Cid Highwind 17:21, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't talking "generally". I was posting my own thoughts on the article title, which is relevant. However, it's apparent this is turning into a general conversation so I will end it here. -- TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 17:23, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

While it is valid to comment on an article's title when it is being disputed/discussed, that is not the case here- it's had the title for three years and is not under dispute. --31dot 17:44, January 25, 2011 (UTC)