Memory Alpha
Register
Memory Alpha
(→‎Removed: removed also)
m (→‎Removed: removed the incite tag. Info was removed)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
This requires a citation to be restored, as "some" isn't encyclopedic. Is this from a book or reference manual, or the ether? - [[w:c:memory-alpha:User:Archduk3|<span style="color:green;">Archduk3</span>]] <sup>[[w:c:memory-alpha:User talk:Archduk3|<span style="color:#9900FF;">talk</span>]]</sup> <small>(on an unsecure connection)</small> 05:04, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 
This requires a citation to be restored, as "some" isn't encyclopedic. Is this from a book or reference manual, or the ether? - [[w:c:memory-alpha:User:Archduk3|<span style="color:green;">Archduk3</span>]] <sup>[[w:c:memory-alpha:User talk:Archduk3|<span style="color:#9900FF;">talk</span>]]</sup> <small>(on an unsecure connection)</small> 05:04, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
   
:Removed: "''An old studio model blueprint designed for promotional studio use has the meaning explained as '''N'''aval '''C'''ontact '''C'''ode. {{incite}}''" if someone can be more specific and provide a pic or a link to a pic then we can put this back. --[[User:Pseudohuman|Pseudohuman]] ([[User talk:Pseudohuman|talk]]) 14:04, June 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
:Removed: "''An old studio model blueprint designed for promotional studio use has the meaning explained as '''N'''aval '''C'''ontact '''C'''ode.''" if someone can be more specific and provide a pic or a link to a pic then we can put this back. --[[User:Pseudohuman|Pseudohuman]] ([[User talk:Pseudohuman|talk]]) 14:04, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:16, 8 February 2014

Changes by Throwback

Starships

  • NCC-500 – added registry, from a ship diagram in ST II
  • NCC-1404 – added registry, from a studio model in “Unification I”
  • NCC-1664 – added registry, seen on a wall chart in “Court Martial”
  • NCC-1672 – added registry, seen on a wall chart in “Court Martial”
  • NCC-1697 – added registry, seen on a wall chart in “Court Martial”
  • NCC-1837 – changed date to 2293, ship is listed on a ship chart from the movie
  • 10281NCC – year deleted, no year stated in episode
  • NCC-10386 – corrected registry to NCC-10376
  • NCC-18253 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-29487 – deleted class, Oberth-class a speculation from Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-38997 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-40521 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-45231 – deleted class, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-50446 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-57418 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-62048 – added registry, from a studio model in “Emissary”
  • NCC-66808 – deleted registry, from the Star Trek Encyclopedia
  • NCC-67016 – changed year from 2366 to 2367
  • NCC-68723 – added registry, from a studio model in “The Best of Both Worlds, Part II”

Runabouts

  • NCC-72617 – deleted registry, registry is illegible in an Okudagram from “Whispers”

Other Registries

  • NCC-2541 – added registry, previous registry for USS Hood (NCC-42296), seen on studio model

For this section, do we add NCC-2590 (USS Valkyrie)? Do we add NCC-71867 (USS Trinculo)? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Throwback (talk • contribs).

The "Other Registries" section is for registries that would be canon if they weren't contradicted by a visible one. - Archduk3 03:55, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the runabout registry, if the Okudagram was seen in the episode, I think it is permissible to use the registry in the canon part of the article if we have a clearer image of said Okudagram from another source. It's only if the Okudagram was not seen at all in the episode that we wouldn't use any information from it. Maybe I'm wrong about that, but that's how I understand it.--31dot 10:40, April 6, 2011 (UTC)


Removed

"Some have stated that NCC stands for Navigational Control Code, an identity code that all federation ships are required to broadcast under normal conditions. In "Mudd's women" Kirk accused Mudd of flying with broadcasting a navigational signal, thereby posing a hazard to navigation. This lends some credence to the claim all ships in the federation were required to broadcast a navigational signal."

This requires a citation to be restored, as "some" isn't encyclopedic. Is this from a book or reference manual, or the ether? - Archduk3 talk (on an unsecure connection) 05:04, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Removed: "An old studio model blueprint designed for promotional studio use has the meaning explained as Naval Contact Code." if someone can be more specific and provide a pic or a link to a pic then we can put this back. --Pseudohuman (talk) 14:04, June 8, 2013 (UTC)