Would still need to be incited from a production material...unless it's from Countdown or other such Apocrypha...in which case it belongs in that section. — Morder 05:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Wouldn't the film's official website constitute either "Other information derived from production staff" or "Reference works created by non-production staff", as discussed here? —Josiah Rowe 05:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Just noticed today that the Star Trek promotional app was updated with a new quiz about Bones, which upon completion awards a detailed biography of the character. This biography includes many details never before revealed in any canon or non-canon sources, including the identity of his ex-wife, Pamela Branch (not Nancy Carter as is sometimes speculated, but whether or not that can be carried over to the Prime Bones is questionable.)
Now I'm sure Memory Alpha policy doesn't consider App biographies to be canon sources, but it might be worth including in a apocrypha section. Dr. Cheis (talk) 04:33, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
her name was also mentioned as Pamela Branch in issue 17 of the comic book series.
Jkirk8907 (talk) 05:04, May 19, 2013 (UTC)JKirk8907
It would indeed be appropriate Apocrypha information. 31dot (talk) 09:07, May 19, 2013 (UTC)