Talk: James T. Kirk/archive

Revision as of 01:09, 6 March 2011

I assume this refers to "The Enemy Within". Is each version of Kirk in this episode a separate entity, and thus worthy of separate articles? If so, is this the best title?--31dot 08:33, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think that we should, but this is a terrible name. And where's the other half? "Good Kirk"? I don't think so... -- sulfur 12:28, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Is the script available, to see how it dealt with this situation?--31dot 19:31, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
If we want to keep this, we could title it as James T. Kirk with some sort of disambiguation qualifier, but I'm not sure what it could be- "duplicate", "Alfa 117"? --31dot 01:01, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

We'd need to have a page for the "good" split too then. And both pages would be pretty slim of information too. -- sulfur 01:04, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

One could make the argument that the Kirk page would be sufficient to talk about both, since both are him. Of course, we have a separate Tuvix article. I don't know.......I would need to see how this page benefits us.--31dot 01:09, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 If we want to keep this, we could title it as James T. Kirk with some sort of disambiguation qualifier, but I'm not sure what it could be- "duplicate", "Alfa 117"? --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:01, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 :We'd need to have a page for the "good" split too then.  And both pages would be pretty slim of information too. -- [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] 01:04, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
+One could make the argument that the Kirk page would be sufficient to talk about both, since both are him.  Of course, we have a separate [[Tuvix]] article.  I don't know.......I would need to see how this page benefits us.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:09, March 6, 2011 (UTC)