| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::I would '''oppose''' a merge as they are both distinct topics. Though a disambig notice at the top of each article should be added. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 18:20, April 10, 2014 (UTC) |
::I would '''oppose''' a merge as they are both distinct topics. Though a disambig notice at the top of each article should be added. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 18:20, April 10, 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Makes sense. Based on that, as the original nominator, I'll go ahead and withdraw the merge suggestion. However, we still need to decide what goes where-- which references belong at "iceman" and which at "ice man". [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] ([[User talk:ProfessorTofty|talk]]) 13:37, April 11, 2014 (UTC) |
:Makes sense. Based on that, as the original nominator, I'll go ahead and withdraw the merge suggestion. However, we still need to decide what goes where-- which references belong at "iceman" and which at "ice man". [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] ([[User talk:ProfessorTofty|talk]]) 13:37, April 11, 2014 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::All I think needs doing is the {{e|Thine Own Self}} reference to be removed from the [[Ice man]] article. Then it should be fine. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 18:06, April 11, 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:06, 11 April 2014
Iceman vs Ice man
The topic of this article is completely separate from that of "Ice man." – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.31.245.173.
- OK. And....? 31dot (talk) 02:13, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
- There's a merge notice on the page so I think he's trying to say the two articles (Iceman and Ice man) shouldn't be merged. --| TrekFan Open a channel 09:36, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, I see now, thanks. The merge tag was added by Professor Tofty who posted in the edit summary: "Merge -- all of the references in this article also appear in "Ice man"". If the two are that separate, then the note on the other article could be removed and replaced with a See Also link. 31dot (talk) 09:49, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
- I would oppose a merge as they are both distinct topics. Though a disambig notice at the top of each article should be added. --| TrekFan Open a channel 18:20, April 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Based on that, as the original nominator, I'll go ahead and withdraw the merge suggestion. However, we still need to decide what goes where-- which references belong at "iceman" and which at "ice man". ProfessorTofty (talk) 13:37, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
- All I think needs doing is the "Thine Own Self" reference to be removed from the Ice man article. Then it should be fine. --| TrekFan Open a channel 18:06, April 11, 2014 (UTC)