This duplicates what is already at unnamed Changlings. --Alan del Beccio 22:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Maybe it should get removed from the other article, as there are three of them, two are named, only one is unnamed (and there is no direct evidence that the infant even was one of the "Hundred"). It would seem to me to be a topic that deserves its own article. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 22:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• There are 98 unnamed changelings, the most logical place to find 98 unnamed changelings would be in the article Unnamed Changelings, regardless if the names of two are known or not. --Alan del Beccio 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Just playing devils advocate here, but just because we know there are 100 does not mean that there are 98 unnamed, as I understand it. I thought we had to see, orat least have a more specific reference to,a character before it gets listed as unnamed. We have only seen 2 (maybe 3) of them. We don't say there are some billion unnamed Klingons, even if we know they probably exist, because we have not seen them. The only difference here is that we have a number for the Hundred, and don't for the total number of klingons. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 22:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)