that picture isnt really Gint; it is just quarks dream of gint. thereore, I would like to suggest we remove it from the article... StoryMaster 20:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

That is why there are quotes around the caption, because it isn't really him. No, do not remove it. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 20:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure about that. If we allow dreams/visions of people to be cannon then what about the Prophet visions? Should we put Odo's photo on the prophet page and call him a prophet; because in Sisko's vision Odo was a prophet? I think this opens a whole an of worms. StoryMaster 20:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Did you read what I wrote? The quotes are there because it isn't really him. We are acknowledging that may not be what he looked like, that it was only how he appeared in a dream. If you would like, I will add that to the caption, but no, we are not removing the image. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 20:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I would also point you to Unnamed Prophets, where an entry on the one that appeared to look as Odo would in fact probably belong. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 20:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)