PNA[]
An anon posted the pna with "grammar" in the edit summary, though I am not entirely sure what the grammatical problem is, or why they did not fix it themselves if they were aware of it. Anyway, anyone know the problem?--31dot 19:06, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- The tenses were mixed and were terrible. I've fixed those. And removed the pna. Someday people will figure out how to do things on their own :) -- sulfur 19:10, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Sometimes it takes another pair of eyes.... :) --31dot 19:11, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Looks a bit better, but the paragraph still reads choppy to me. And sometimes while I'm browsing, I notice things but don't have time to correct them? Good work all. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.91.27.19 at 15:31, 9 April 2010.