m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Image talk: +File talk:) !!wikia-credits fix!!) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==PNA-Incomplete== |
==PNA-Incomplete== |
||
| − | The only two verbal references to deuterium tank I can find are in {{VOY|One|The Void}}. I'm sure more can be extrapolated from the image as well, as per [[ |
+ | The only two verbal references to deuterium tank I can find are in {{VOY|One|The Void}}. I'm sure more can be extrapolated from the image as well, as per [[File talk:Warp propulsion systems graphic.jpg]]. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan]] 21:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |
==Alternate Timeline== |
==Alternate Timeline== |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Hard to say, since it takes the reaction with [[Dilithium]] and [[antimatter]] for the Deuterium to enter a state of usefulness, which could back up Deuterium being inert. I can't find any other sources that state raw deuterium as being an inert material. - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Adm. Enzo Aquarius]]...[[User talk: Enzo Aquarius|I'm listening]] 15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
:Hard to say, since it takes the reaction with [[Dilithium]] and [[antimatter]] for the Deuterium to enter a state of usefulness, which could back up Deuterium being inert. I can't find any other sources that state raw deuterium as being an inert material. - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|Adm. Enzo Aquarius]]...[[User talk: Enzo Aquarius|I'm listening]] 15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::It's not because we don't know what it was until they tell us. — [[User:Morder|Morder]] 16:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
::It's not because we don't know what it was until they tell us. — [[User:Morder|Morder]] 16:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::They DID tell us. The dialog called it water. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 16:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 5 March 2010
Parts of this article sound like Technical Manual or otherwise non-canon info. Accuracy should be checked. -- Cid Highwind 04:04, 3 Apr 2004 (PST)
- Just a follow up, two and a half years later. Is this, or is this not taken from the TNG TM? --Alan del Beccio 22:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
PNA-Incomplete
The only two verbal references to deuterium tank I can find are in VOY: "One", "The Void". I'm sure more can be extrapolated from the image as well, as per File talk:Warp propulsion systems graphic.jpg. --Alan 21:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Alternate Timeline
In the AbramsVerse Star Trek 2009 film, is the "Inert Reactant" in the tubes Scotty is sucked through Deuterium? The labels on the pipes only read "Inert Reactant". Joeloveland 15:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hard to say, since it takes the reaction with Dilithium and antimatter for the Deuterium to enter a state of usefulness, which could back up Deuterium being inert. I can't find any other sources that state raw deuterium as being an inert material. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius...I'm listening 15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- It's not because we don't know what it was until they tell us. — Morder 16:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- They DID tell us. The dialog called it water. --OuroborosCobra talk 16:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- It's not because we don't know what it was until they tell us. — Morder 16:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)