Something with the following doesn't seem right:
- Though it is never explicitly stated, one can speculate that this reprimand was later removed from D'Amato's record for his actions could be construed as not of his own making, but rather the result of another, in this case Ambassador Sarek. The same could be argued for the hundreds of other crew members likewise impacted.
Why do we need this type of information, especially when it applies to nearly the entire crew, and comes across almost entirely as speculation? --Alan del Beccio 18:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'd agree. Speculation from the get-go. Should probably be removed. And it doesn't just come across as speculation. It's stated that it is pure speculation :) -- Sulfur 18:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)