legitimate sources and references?? --Gvsualan 18:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The first paragraph is factual, and to my knowledge the second is in agreement with Star Trek canon -- N. H. B.
I am not sure about this, but I think that atoms contain both matter and antimatter particles, since they found antimatter by knocking atoms apart. The Deterium would have to be only half of this. I am no expert at this, I just want to put it to question. There is a NOVAscienceNOW podcast that talks about it entitled "Alien Encounters and Antimatter" which might yeild some information
- You might want to try reading some clear, textual notations about the science of antimatter -- try starting with Wikipedia:Antimatter.
- Antiparticles like positrons are contained in "normal matter" congregations like our solar system -- but they have never, to current scientific knowledge, formed antimatter naturally. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk
Someone needs to sort out what's canon and what's not in this article, and integrate references into the body of the article to support what remains. -- Renegade54 23:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- The okudagram at the top of the page adequately explains everything contained in the article. What, in your opinion, needs further references? 18.104.22.168 22:26, June 17, 2013 (UTC)