Despite the name of the episode, shouldn't this article be titled Angel I to keep with the usual naming system for planets? --Steve 04:25, 19 Nov 2004 (CET)
The rule in this case, is that you go with the title as it appears on screen. --TOSrules 07:49, Nov 19, 2004 (CET)
- I'm not talking about the episode title, but the planet title. I mean, we don't have an article called Sigma Draconis Seven, do we? --Steve 17:52, 19 Nov 2004 (CET)
- True.. episode titles are spelled out according to a separate formatting rule, both by the creators and by MA. I think the planetary notation should be corrected -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 18:29, 19 Nov 2004 (CET)
- I thought that also when doing the summary for the episode, but was a bit too lazy to change it. Since its come up now, I would agree with changing the planet entry to Angel I. --Brian M 20:17, Nov 19, 2004 (CET)
My mistake, you are right --TOSrules 23:58, Nov 19, 2004 (CET)
Are the residents of Angel I human? They look human, but are not specified as "alien" either. --Ambassador Weyoun 12:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Considering the low technology level of these people, and the fact that they were never said to be human, I woul say they aren't. They don't seem to have the tech needed for even basic space travel. --OuroborosCobra talk 12:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Changes to page
According to "MA:NOT", it is stated, Although there are a great many gaps in our knowledge about the Star Trek universe, Memory Alpha articles are not the place for personal opinions. Don't write an entire article on a speculative subject – if we don't know, then leave it blank. The name of Angel I's system is not given in the episode "Angel One". Naming the system is adding speculation to the page.Lakenheath72 (talk) 23:49, April 2, 2015 (UTC)