King v PrinceEdit

It's not redundant. He is the King. Back then he was only the crown prince. That's different. --9er 05:44, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. Well, the double parentheses were redudant and I'll reword the other part to say at the time, because the way it was formed did sound redundant. Moo Cow 05:46, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

That works. --9er 05:48, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Picture as king? Edit

Would it be appropriate for the article to have an image of King Abdullah as he looks today, perhaps performing some royal function? I know that for actors we sometimes have images of them "out of character", but I wouldn't want to go too far afield from Star Trek relevance. —Josiah Rowe 13:21, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Not really. The two Trek images that we have are sufficient. Leave the royal function images to Wikipedia. -- sulfur 13:28, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. We currently have the two types of Star Trek-related actor images; him appearing in character and him out of character but on the set. I think that's enough. --Defiant 14:10, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks — that's why I asked. —Josiah Rowe 16:56, August 27, 2010 (UTC)