Is this a possible reimagined Binar? and if so, where is his other half?
98.77.175.195 16:28, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Anything is possible, but I highly doubt it in this case. However, we don't put what is "possible" in articles, only what we can prove. 31dot (talk) 20:40, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
I just had a thought. #0718 suggests that there may be others like him. It could be a series number.Compaq (talk) 02:11, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
...direct "telepathic" connection? "Wireless" connection would be the more correct terminology. Compaq (talk) 18:18, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Android
Wikipedia, without source, describes 0718 as an android in its article on Into Darkness; I removed this descriptor but the change will probably be reverted. Other than the opinion of a Trek journalist, is there anything official to suggest 0718 is an android? 70.72.211.35 15:39, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
- In an interview Gatt stated that the character was not an android or robot, but a cybernetically enhanced human. I'm not sure if that's enough to categorize him as a human but I've added the quote to the page. 31dot (talk) 02:17, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
Removed
I removed this from the background info:
- However, Anthony Pascale opined 0718 could not be Human due to his synthesized voice and computer-generated eyes, presumably added in post-production.
Unless Pascale was involved in the production of this movie, his is "just" another fan opinion. I also removed Species=Android from the sidebar, because that wasn't mentioned in the movie. --Cid Highwind (talk) 18:52, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
0718
Is there a certain reason for which 'Science Officer' is considered to be part of his name? there is also 'Navigation Officer Darwin' in the credits. Shouldn't this be moved to 0718?--Shisma