Memory Alpha talk:Pages needing attention

How do articles get removed from this page after they no longer need attention? Is there a procedure? If not, do we need a procedure? --K 09:45, 27 Jun 2004 (CEST)

I think that procedure should be straightforward - if you edited the listed page, simply add something like "Done. -- YourSignature". Someone else could then check that page and delete the entry completely if he agrees. -- Cid Highwind 15:19, 27 Jun 2004 (CEST)

I suggest keeping the entry for a week after the Done has been posted, than delete it. -- Redge 16:40, 27 Jun 2004 (CEST)

I think Cid's suggestion is pretty reasonable. -- Dan Carlson 17:35, 27 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Administrator attention

I've added this section because there are a few pages which I think need administrator attention, and this works faster than posting on every sysop's talk page. -- Redge | Talk 15:45, 3 Sep 2004 (CEST)

{{pna-cite}}

Does {{pna-cite}} add pages to a corresponding category so that we can peruse the entries and see if we can provide citations to pages/images that need them? — THOR 15:17, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

{{pna-unformatted}}

Can we get this mean more than just "needs wikification"? Like recently, we got several novels entered but they needed to be formatted into the style used for novel pages. Since it is true that the page is unformatted to that style, it is untrue that it just;; needs wikification. --Gvsualan 21:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Recently reverted

It has been decided in the past that these messages should only appear at the bottom of a page. -- Cid Highwind 06:13, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

{{pna-noncanon}}

moved from Template talk:Pna-noncanon

"The population of templates on memory alpha has trippled in the last three months." Do we need this template? It doesn't actually serve a purpose. The message its trying to get across would be better served on the creators talk page, and the article itself should probably get a "deletion" or "merge" template, to merge it into its novels page. -AJ Halliwell 15:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

And there I was, trying to add exactly that comment... :) I think {{pna-inaccurate}} and {{pna-cite}} already exist for every possible target of this template. As a simple "message" template, it shouldn't have a "pna" prefix. -- Cid Highwind 15:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

AJ, you funny. Anyway, I agree with Cid on this. Also, maybe we should put this one on every novel and comic. ;) --Bp 15:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

That's fine... lol... delete it. :) -- Renegade54 16:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)