Articles nominated for removal

Transporter

This article has POV problems, is incomplete, and IMO is structured poorly. - Archduk3 19:38, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Support. Should be removed for the POV problems alone, but I agree with all his reasoning.--31dot 19:46, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Exocomp

Fair enough this was nominated in 2005 (and thus, we can't "grandfather"), but there is a lot missing from it in terms of quality and background notes. I have added all the points I can get from the Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion (only 1 point was mentioned before) and also an apocrypha note, but I'm sure there can be more information to add there. Additionally, three of the bg notes need citing and [personally] the whole write up could be better. I am prepared to work on this article to bring it up to scratch, but I believe it should be removed as an FA now and re-nominated once it's undergone improvement. --| TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 17:10, August 19, 2011 (UTC)