Articles nominated for removal

Xindi-Aquatic

Lacking an "appearances" list, I'd say this article, which was granted FA status when only 3 votes was considered ample, is incomplete. It also doesn't have much bg info and some of the other info could be more relevant to the topic, as in the case of one paragraph in the "history" section that doesn't contain any info about the Aquatics whatsoever! --Defiant 14:03, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Support for all those reasons. The background note under Physiology is particularly lame compared to today's standards (It's essentially "Oh, look it up yourself if you're interested"). Also, Defiant, since you added it back in 2005, do you have the citation for the Curry interview? :-) –Cleanse ^{( talk | contribs )} 23:48, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comment: Haha! You expect me to remember a minor incident more than 5 years ago?! I can hardly remember yesterday!! Lol! Suggestions are that it might be from ENT Season 3 DVD or the magazine cited, issue 49 of Star Trek: Communicator, but probably from the DVD. --Defiant 00:08, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

• Support: It simply isn't up to the standard, IMO. --| TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 23:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

"The Way of the Warrior"

I don't think the summary is quite up to scratch when compared against some of the other feature-length episodes. It seems to be lacking in some areas and also uses abbreviations inconsistently, particularly "Deep Space 9" and "DS9". Also, there are a few minor spelling/grammar/format issues and many of the background notes are uncited or cited without page numbers. --| TrekFan ^{Open a channel} 16:39, March 21, 2011 (UTC)