Articles nominated for removal
- – The preceding unsigned comment was added by DS9-FTW (talk • contribs).
- Why do you feel this? Give us a reason. -- sulfur 14:53, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. If no reason is provided for wanting removal, or no one else expresses support for it, I would suggest this suggestion be considered invalid, as the voting policy states users must have been registered for two weeks and have twenty significant contributions in order to vote(though anyone can suggest removal).--31dot 19:39, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
Day of the Dove
For the background information section. There are no citations and plenty of speculation ("this may have been", "could be" etc.). Also, there are too many notes about where things are on the Enterprise, which is more relevant to Constitution-class and Constitution class decks. The section needs a serious rewrite to be up to FA standards. – Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 10:45, April 28, 2010 (UTC)