Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article reviews

View source

Back to page

(Deep Space 9: +support)
(- 3 success)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
==Reconfirmations without objections==
 
==Reconfirmations without objections==
=== [[Klingon Civil War]] ===
 
{{blurb|Klingon Civil War}}
 
A featured article from back in July 2004. Haven't completely read it, so I'm not yet sure if we should keep it. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:16, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*I've created a blurb and done a once over on this, and I think it's still FA material, so '''support'''. There is a strangely constructed run on sentence about the Duras family's history with the Romulans though, and if anyone has a good idea how to address that, please do. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 22:12, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''', the sentence nonwithstanding. [[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:23, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
=== [[Xindi superweapon]] ===
 
{{blurb|Xindi superweapon}}
 
A featured article from back in July 2004. Haven't completely read it, so I'm not yet sure if we should keep it. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:16, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''. This article still seems to be up to FA standards, and I have created a blurb. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:07, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''; still worthy of FA status. [[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:11, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''', though I think it could do with a name change, as a bg source for the name "superweapon" alludes me! In DVD subtitles, it's called "super weapon" by Dan Curry. "Primary Weapon" is much more common in scripts, which I suspect would be the go-to source for this. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 13:09, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
=== [[Deep Space 9]] ===
 
{{blurb|Deep Space 9}}
 
A featured article from back in June 2004. Haven't completely read it, so I'm not yet sure if we should keep it. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:16, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*Did a once over one this and created a blurb, it seems to still be FA material, so '''support'''. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:25, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''. Still seems to be a good FA. [[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:10, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''; room for improvement, but it's an acceptable FA, IMO. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 21:27, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Reconfirmations with objections==
 
==Reconfirmations with objections==

Revision as of 20:37, May 18, 2012

Template:FARecons

Reconfirmations without objections

Reconfirmations with objections

James T. Kirk

Template:FA/James T. Kirk

Featured articles simply shouldn't require citation as long as this one has. There's also issues with notes on the Enterprise-A being renamed (something that isn't clear as far as I remember), info missing in the background section even though there are links from other sections of the article (namely the link from Kirk's 2281 retirement, and these links could be improved with divs if they all need to be in the bg section at the end of the article), amongst other, more minor issues. I think this article needs be looked at with a critical eye before being reconfirmed, and that five votes are called for here. - Archduk3 22:17, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

  • Oppose. - Archduk3 22:17, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose; an article on one of the primary characters in all of Star Trek should be one of our best, and this one is not there yet. 31dot 22:58, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Early reconfirmations

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki