|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| |
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
|
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| |
==Reconfirmations without objections== |
|
==Reconfirmations without objections== |
| − |
=== [[Ezri Dax]] === |
|
| − |
{{blurb|Ezri Dax}} |
|
| − |
Featured way back in 2004, I think this FA has held up, and been updated, pretty well, and is still one of the best article we have. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 05:22, March 21, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support'''. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 05:22, March 21, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support'''. Still seems like an excellent article. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 11:18, March 22, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support'''. - I enjoyed reading it and am in agreement with 31dot and Duke's assessments--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 19:46, March 23, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
=== [[Second Battle of Deep Space 9]] === |
|
| − |
{{blurb|Second Battle of Deep Space 9}} |
|
| − |
Nominated en mass in 2004 with the rest of the other five Dominion War battles at the time. This article would require a blurb if reconfirmed, and I have no opinion either as of yet on if it should. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 05:29, March 21, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support'''. Made a few minor changes and put together a blurb. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 11:11, March 22, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support''' with the changes made. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 11:18, March 22, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support'''. - I have read through it, and as far as I am concerned I can not find any fault, so I like to reconfirm the FA status. --[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 23:38, March 23, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
=== [[Operation Return]] === |
|
| − |
{{blurb|Operation Return}} |
|
| − |
Nominated en mass in 2004 with the rest of the other five Dominion War battles at the time. This article would require a blurb if reconfirmed, and I have no opinion either as of yet on if it should. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 05:31, March 21, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support''' - After reading the article and having done some work on the sidebar, I do find this article still up to specs and a nice readable addition to a larger story line..--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 03:47, March 24, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*'''Support''', now that I worked on some of the wording and format issues. I had to undo the changes Sennim made to sidebar though, as they broke the format. This is the reason the Dominion War article doesn't have the image sidebar originally from the blurb incorporated into it. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 04:04, March 24, 2012 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
==Reconfirmations with objections== |
|
==Reconfirmations with objections== |
Every two years a featured article will need to be brought up for reconfirmation, to ensure it is still an example of Memory Alpha's best work. Featured articles more than two years old will be automatically added to the list to the right.
It is expected that these articles will have undergone revisions over that time to keep them up to date, but it's important to make sure that these revisions have maintained the quality expected of a featured article.
Before starting a reconfirmation discussion, please make sure you are familiar with the reconfirmation policy. For past reconfirmation discussions, please see the archive.
Reconfirmations can be started by beginning a new discussion under either "Nominations without objections", for articles you support or have no preference to, or "Nominations with objections", for articles you oppose, with a heading containing a link back to the article you want to suggest. Early reconfirmations should be under the section of the same name. Reconfirmations should display, and have a link to, the blurb used on the main page, just add {{Blurb|ARTICLE NAME}} before the discussion, and it's generally a good idea to link to the FA history on the article's talk page as well. If you have a preference on the article, please briefly state why.
Once this is done, a notice that the article is up for reconfirmation should be added to the article in question by inserting {{faupdate}} at the top of the page, above any other templates. Early reconfirmations should use the {{farc}} template.
When you are commenting on a reconfirmation, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose it. When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".
Reconfirmations without objections
Reconfirmations with objections
Early reconfirmations
About → Policies and guidelines → FA policies → FA criteria → Nominations for FAs → Featured articles → Reconfirmation of featured articles