Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article reviews

View source

Back to page

(+Tuvix for FA removal)
(Articles nominated for removal: archiving)
Line 3: Line 3:
   
 
==Articles nominated for removal==
 
==Articles nominated for removal==
=== [[Transporter]] ===
 
This article has POV problems, is incomplete, and IMO is structured poorly. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 19:38, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
*'''Support'''. Should be removed for the POV problems alone, but I agree with all his reasoning.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 19:46, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
Since I completely forgot about this, and didn't add the notice to the page apparently, let's reset the clock for fairness. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 17:39, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''' for the reasons above. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''' - lots of citation problems as well.&ndash;[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 23:23, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''' - also, [[Template:ArticleOfTheWeek/15]] needs to be replaced with other content in case of removal. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 23:30, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
===[[Exocomp]]===
 
Fair enough this was nominated in 2005 (and thus, we can't "grandfather"), but there is a lot missing from it in terms of quality and background notes. I have added all the points I can get from the ''[[Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion]]'' (only 1 point was mentioned before) and also an apocrypha note, but I'm sure there can be more information to add there. Additionally, three of the bg notes need citing and [personally] the whole write up could be better. I am prepared to work on this article to bring it up to scratch, but I believe it should be removed as an FA now and re-nominated once it's undergone improvement. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 17:10, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
 
*'''Support''' since it seems to need work.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 21:44, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''' - also, [[Template:ArticleOfTheWeek/10]] needs to be replaced with other content in case of removal. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 23:30, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''' - I agree that it looks like it could do with some work, such as the addition of citations. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 05:48, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
 
   
 
===[[Tuvix]]===
 
===[[Tuvix]]===

Revision as of 10:20, August 27, 2011

Template:Farc

Articles nominated for removal

Tuvix

In my opinion, this article should never have become an FA to begin with. There's some information lacking (such as relationship with the crew, time spent in Sandrines etc) but as you can see, I have also added a lot more background information and quotes to the article that weren't there before. Aside from the fact it was incomplete when nominated, my edits have changed it considerably from what it was back then so I think a new round of voting is required once the article has been worked on some more (which I will do over the coming days). --| TrekFan Open a channel 03:20, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki