Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article reviews

View source

Back to page

({{e|The Way of the Warrior}}: re)
(Articles nominated for removal: removing WOTW, >7 days inactivity)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:'''Comment''': Haha! You expect me to remember a minor incident more than 5 years ago?! I can hardly remember yesterday!! Lol! Suggestions are that it might be from [[ENT Season 3 DVD]] or the magazine cited, issue 49 of ''[[Star Trek: Communicator]]'', but probably from the DVD. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 00:08, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 
:'''Comment''': Haha! You expect me to remember a minor incident more than 5 years ago?! I can hardly remember yesterday!! Lol! Suggestions are that it might be from [[ENT Season 3 DVD]] or the magazine cited, issue 49 of ''[[Star Trek: Communicator]]'', but probably from the DVD. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 00:08, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''': It simply isn't up to the standard, IMO. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 23:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''': It simply isn't up to the standard, IMO. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 23:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 
==={{e|The Way of the Warrior}}===
 
 
I don't think the summary is quite up to scratch when compared against some of the other feature-length episodes. It seems to be lacking in some areas and also uses abbreviations inconsistently, particularly "Deep Space 9" and "DS9". Also, there are a few minor spelling/grammar/format issues and many of the background notes are uncited or cited without page numbers. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 16:39, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 
*Well, for starters, page numbers are not compulsory, just preferable. Also, I don't see a "problem" (specifically) with using abbreviations randomly, adding a bit more variety to the article! --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 08:48, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Having said that, I'll choose to '''support''' the article's removal from FA status, due to my belief that it requires a thorough clean-up. Plus, even though page numbers are technically preferable, I reckon a typical FA ''should'' be using preferable methods. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 09:49, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
 
:'''Comment''' - I added the page numbers and generally fixed up the citations. I'll look more closely at the article in the next couple of the days before I cast my vote.&ndash;[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 11:41, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
 
::'''Comment''' - I'm impressed, Cleanse. :) --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 12:05, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
 
*Ok, I'm going to '''oppose''' this. I think this is a pretty solid article. All notes that should have a citation now have one. (If not, tag it :-) The background information covers the main points about the production of this episode. There could always be more, but I think what's there at the moment is comprehensive enough to merit FA status.&ndash;[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 06:53, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Oppose''', for the reasons already stated. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 16:37, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 18:48, April 11, 2011

Template:Farc

Articles nominated for removal

Xindi-Aquatic

Lacking an "appearances" list, I'd say this article, which was granted FA status when only 3 votes was considered ample, is incomplete. It also doesn't have much bg info and some of the other info could be more relevant to the topic, as in the case of one paragraph in the "history" section that doesn't contain any info about the Aquatics whatsoever! --Defiant 14:03, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Support for all those reasons. The background note under Physiology is particularly lame compared to today's standards (It's essentially "Oh, look it up yourself if you're interested"). Also, Defiant, since you added it back in 2005, do you have the citation for the Curry interview? :-) –Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 23:48, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comment: Haha! You expect me to remember a minor incident more than 5 years ago?! I can hardly remember yesterday!! Lol! Suggestions are that it might be from ENT Season 3 DVD or the magazine cited, issue 49 of Star Trek: Communicator, but probably from the DVD. --Defiant 00:08, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support: It simply isn't up to the standard, IMO. --| TrekFan Open a channel 23:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki