Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (→‎Discussion: delete)
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
   
 
== Deletion rationale ==
 
== Deletion rationale ==
As per [[User:Jörg|Jörg]]'s comment on the article's [[Talk:Federation standard|talk page]], there does not seem to be any [[canon]] references to a "Federation standard" [[language]], and might be from a [[novel]]ization. - [[User:Intricated|Intricated]] <sup> [[User Talk:Intricated|<span style="color:#66BBFF;">talk page</span></sup>]] 00:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
+
As per [[User:Jörg|Jörg]]'s comment on the article's [[Talk:Federation standard|talk page]], there does not seem to be any [[canon]] references to a "Federation standard" [[language]], and might be from a [[novelization]]. - [[User:Intricated|Intricated]] <sup> [[User Talk:Intricated|<span style="color:#66BBFF;">talk page</span></sup>]] 00:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
   
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
Line 27: Line 27:
   
 
== Admin resolution ==
 
== Admin resolution ==
  +
'''Deleted'''. Left talk page as a possible future reference. -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 13:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
 
   
  +
:I deleted this again. It was created under some absurd title [[Federation Standard (language)]], that was mentioned on the "Requested pages", but as stated on the aforementioned talk page and above votes for deletion, there are no known [[canon]] references to this term. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 01:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+
[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 12:46, 15 September 2013


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Federation standard".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an admin will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

As per Jörg's comment on the article's talk page, there does not seem to be any canon references to a "Federation standard" language, and might be from a novelization. - Intricated talk page 00:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

Admin resolution

Deleted. Left talk page as a possible future reference. -- Sulfur 13:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I deleted this again. It was created under some absurd title Federation Standard (language), that was mentioned on the "Requested pages", but as stated on the aforementioned talk page and above votes for deletion, there are no known canon references to this term. --Alan del Beccio 01:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)