(→Discussion: + comment) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions)) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*'''Delete''' - I made my views clear on the discussion page that appropriate articles on the alternate reality and its tie-in media discuss the differences. --[[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] ([[User talk:Alientraveller|talk]]) 13:02, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - I made my views clear on the discussion page that appropriate articles on the alternate reality and its tie-in media discuss the differences. --[[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] ([[User talk:Alientraveller|talk]]) 13:02, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I don't see the need of such an article. It is also unclear which point of view this should have. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] ([[User talk:ThomasHL|talk]]) 14:24, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. I don't see the need of such an article. It is also unclear which point of view this should have. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] ([[User talk:ThomasHL|talk]]) 14:24, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Delete''': Good reasons for deletion have been stated above. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] ([[User talk:Jörg|talk]]) 14:57, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Delete''' or '''merge''' with the alternate reality article. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 17:25, September 9, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Delete''': I consider this page as having a built-in failure rate. Until this experiment with the alternate reality ends, I believe we won't know for sure what has been changed or what hasn't been changed. Look at what happened with the ''[[Star Trek: Star Charts]]''. One of the contributors, at TrekBBS, admitted that the book was obsolete at time of publication. Let's take one example. After the book was published, we discover that there is a second M-class desert planet in the Vulcan system. (When I am writing desert here, I am thinking of Antarctica. This continent is classified as a desert.) This information sunk the Vulcan system model as it was presented in the book. So, I vote for deletion.[[User:Throwback|Throwback]] ([[User talk:Throwback|talk]]) 16:16, September 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Admin resolution == |
== Admin resolution == |
||
| − | <!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions |
+ | <!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. --> |
| + | '''Deleted''' per clear consensus. [[User:31dot|31dot]] ([[User talk:31dot|talk]]) 18:31, September 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
+ | [[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
Latest revision as of 12:15, 15 September 2013
This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "A list of notable events in the Star Trek Universe that remain unaffected by the 2009 film.".
- If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
- If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
- If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".
In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
Deletion rationale
It is unnecessary to specifically point out what has not changed in the timeline, as it is assumed that aspects have not changed unless it is specifically shown that they have. Basically the page would contain everything on the site not mentioned in the 2009 or the next film. There is also an external link to a similar article on the alternate reality page. 31dot (talk) 10:55, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
- Delete - I made my views clear on the discussion page that appropriate articles on the alternate reality and its tie-in media discuss the differences. --Alientraveller (talk) 13:02, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see the need of such an article. It is also unclear which point of view this should have. Tom (talk) 14:24, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Good reasons for deletion have been stated above. --Jörg (talk) 14:57, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete or merge with the alternate reality article. - Archduk3 17:25, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: I consider this page as having a built-in failure rate. Until this experiment with the alternate reality ends, I believe we won't know for sure what has been changed or what hasn't been changed. Look at what happened with the Star Trek: Star Charts. One of the contributors, at TrekBBS, admitted that the book was obsolete at time of publication. Let's take one example. After the book was published, we discover that there is a second M-class desert planet in the Vulcan system. (When I am writing desert here, I am thinking of Antarctica. This continent is classified as a desert.) This information sunk the Vulcan system model as it was presented in the book. So, I vote for deletion.Throwback (talk) 16:16, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
Admin resolution
Deleted per clear consensus. 31dot (talk) 18:31, September 22, 2012 (UTC)