Wikia

Memory Alpha

Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

Discuss96
37,500pages on
this wiki
Revision as of 17:16, April 30, 2005 by Dmsdbo (Talk | contribs)

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

  • Organian -- It seems to be fully inclusive of the known subject matter and is both interesting and highly readable. -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Trials and Tribble-ations -- This page has good background info on the episode, and it provides a good summary. It's as extensive as any of the other episode pages that have been added.--docdude316 15:48, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support -- rebelstrike 16:58, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Wary, having become accustomed to Defiant's terribly in-depth and sectioned out episodic articles; I'm afraid this one doesn't yet measure up. But I'm worried that I'm holding it to too high of a standard perhaps and that maybe Defiant's articles go above and beyond a standard of excellence that this article still meets. For now, I'll posture to be neutral. — THOR 17:30, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Reservations - I agree with THOR, and I think the summary should have sections, IE: Act 1, Act 2 etc. Defiant's style of episodes should be the standard to which all episode articles should be tested, IMHO. zsingaya 18:29, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Against - Not only is it much shorter and less detailed than the summaries provided by Defiant, the choppy style does work towards its advantage. It is a solid start, but must be widely fleshed out. -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Harrad-Sar's ship -- a page with extensive information on the Orion ship. --Defiant | Talk 00:26, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, good details and fitting use of pictures. A worthy candidate, IMHO.--Scimitar 10:18, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, superb article in such an infinitesimal construct time. — THOR 17:30, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support - well done Defiant, for putting the sections in, now its well laid out I think it should be featured. zsingaya 18:20, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Defiant class -- I'm frankly surprised that this isn't a featured article. Plenty of information, beautifully laid out and appropriate use of pictures. Just as well written as the featured Sovereign class, Galaxy class and Intrepid class articles, IMHO.--Scimitar 18:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, could use a bit more fleshing out but otherwise as good as the other class articles listed. -- 70.24.87.51 00:50, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, I agree this is at least as good as the Intrepid-class article. All the major parts of the ship are well represented. zsingaya 08:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Neutral. I gave this a wiki markup, I think that should be a required part of final acceptance/completion. --Gvsualan 10:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Actually, on second thoughts I'm going to have to agree with Ottens below, there is a LOT of DS9 Tech Manual stuff in there and that needs to be more clearly pointed out. --Gvsualan 23:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Neutral. Considering I wrote the bulk of the article, it wouldnt be really fair to vote. The main reason of objection at the time was that the article did not include in-line references, if I recall correctly... Anyhow, nice to see it featured now. Ottens 15:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Ayala -- very comprehensive and an excellent work-up of a minor character. -- Dmsdbo 21:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, exceptionally comprehensive with gouts of information. — THOR 17:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, a surprisingly large amount of canon information and references for an extra (albeit a regular one).--Scimitar 18:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, My favorite reoccuring character! This lists basically every single appearence of his, I like it. The chronological-ness of it is questionable though (granted, that's not a word...). -AJHalliwell 22:44, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, especially with the delightfully cynical "memorable quotes" section. Is there anyway this article could be better organized, though? Perhaps catagories, topics, instead of a chronological mass? --Brad Rousse 00:01, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • When I originally expanded the article, I tried ordering things like I did for characters such as Beverly Crusher and William T. Riker, but I never added categories for Ayala because I didn't really consider it that vital for such a small article and (relatively) insignificant character! But I've tried to continue from where AJHalliwell started and add categories like for the major characters... see what you think... -- SmokeDetector47 // talk 00:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Support - now there are sections to this article, and another picture, this looks like a proper featured article! zsingaya 08:05, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Ethan Novakovich -- self-nomination. Another minor subject, but one that I again feel is wholly comprehensive of the subject matter. — THOR 18:30, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • support Tyrant 18:18, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)Tyrant
    • Support. -- SmokeDetector47 // talk 00:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support...--Gvsualan 10:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Neutral I question whether other examples of minor characters are needed as features of this style. We already have Graython Tolar as an indication of how best to create this type of article. -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki