Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

View source

Back to page

(-Ayala, successful nomination)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
*** Actually, on second thoughts I'm going to have to agree with Ottens below, there is a LOT of DS9 Tech Manual stuff in there and that needs to be more clearly pointed out. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 23:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
*** Actually, on second thoughts I'm going to have to agree with Ottens below, there is a LOT of DS9 Tech Manual stuff in there and that needs to be more clearly pointed out. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 23:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Neutral'''. Considering I wrote the bulk of the article, it wouldnt be really fair to vote. The main reason of objection at the time was that the article did not include in-line references, if I recall correctly... Anyhow, nice to see it featured now. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 15:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Neutral'''. Considering I wrote the bulk of the article, it wouldnt be really fair to vote. The main reason of objection at the time was that the article did not include in-line references, if I recall correctly... Anyhow, nice to see it featured now. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 15:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
*[[Ayala]] -- very comprehensive and an excellent work-up of a minor character. -- [[User:Dmsdbo|Dmsdbo]] 21:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
** '''Support''', ''exceptionally'' comprehensive with gouts of information. — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 17:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''', a surprisingly large amount of canon information and references for an extra (albeit a regular one).--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 18:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''', My favorite reoccuring character! This lists basically every single appearence of his, I like it. ''The chronological-ness of it is questionable though (granted, that's not a word...).''<This has since been fixed, by me and others. No complaints, my full support! -[[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 22:44, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''', especially with the delightfully cynical "memorable quotes" section. Is there anyway this article could be better organized, though? Perhaps catagories, topics, instead of a chronological mass? --[[User:Brad Rousse|Brad Rousse]] 00:01, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
***When I originally expanded the article, I tried ordering things like I did for characters such as [[Beverly Crusher]] and [[William T. Riker]], but I never added categories for Ayala because I didn't really consider it that vital for such a small article and (relatively) insignificant character! But I've tried to continue from where [[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] started and add categories like for the major characters... see what you think... -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] // [[User_talk:SmokeDetector47|''talk'']] 00:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
***'''Support''' - now there are sections to this article, and another picture, this looks like a proper featured article! [[User:Zsingaya|zsingaya]] 08:05, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 23:20, May 2, 2005

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

  • Organian -- It seems to be fully inclusive of the known subject matter and is both interesting and highly readable. -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Harrad-Sar's ship -- a page with extensive information on the Orion ship. --Defiant | Talk 00:26, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, good details and fitting use of pictures. A worthy candidate, IMHO.--Scimitar 10:18, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, superb article in such an infinitesimal construct time. — THOR 17:30, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support - well done Defiant, for putting the sections in, now its well laid out I think it should be featured. zsingaya 18:20, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Defiant class -- I'm frankly surprised that this isn't a featured article. Plenty of information, beautifully laid out and appropriate use of pictures. Just as well written as the featured Sovereign class, Galaxy class and Intrepid class articles, IMHO.--Scimitar 18:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, could use a bit more fleshing out but otherwise as good as the other class articles listed. -- 70.24.87.51 00:50, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, I agree this is at least as good as the Intrepid-class article. All the major parts of the ship are well represented. zsingaya 08:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Neutral. I gave this a wiki markup, I think that should be a required part of final acceptance/completion. --Gvsualan 10:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Actually, on second thoughts I'm going to have to agree with Ottens below, there is a LOT of DS9 Tech Manual stuff in there and that needs to be more clearly pointed out. --Gvsualan 23:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Neutral. Considering I wrote the bulk of the article, it wouldnt be really fair to vote. The main reason of objection at the time was that the article did not include in-line references, if I recall correctly... Anyhow, nice to see it featured now. Ottens 15:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

  • Trials and Tribble-ations -- This page has good background info on the episode, and it provides a good summary. It's as extensive as any of the other episode pages that have been added.--docdude316 15:48, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support -- rebelstrike 16:58, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Wary, having become accustomed to Defiant's terribly in-depth and sectioned out episodic articles; I'm afraid this one doesn't yet measure up. But I'm worried that I'm holding it to too high of a standard perhaps and that maybe Defiant's articles go above and beyond a standard of excellence that this article still meets. For now, I'll posture to be neutral. — THOR 17:30, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Reservations - I agree with THOR, and I think the summary should have sections, IE: Act 1, Act 2 etc. Defiant's style of episodes should be the standard to which all episode articles should be tested, IMHO. zsingaya 18:29, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Against - Not only is it much shorter and less detailed than the summaries provided by Defiant, the choppy style does work towards its advantage. It is a solid start, but must be widely fleshed out. -- Dmsdbo 17:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Starship Down -- Its a well written article and has a good structure to it. -- rebelstrike 22:50, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Oppose, its well written but would certainly benefit from images; at least one or two. — THOR 23:16, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki