|
|
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| |
****''Any'' article can be a featured article, as long as it's good enough. The length of an article should not be considered here, it's about the quality of the writing, and of course all available information should be included. Since I don't remember the episodes referred to, Michael could be correst as far as I know in saying these references do not support "facts" written here. That should be checked by those who ''have'' seen the episodes. As last remark, I would suggest not using the two symbols of the powers involved in this conflict in such a fashion - IMO it looks rather akward. I don't think there are any images of the actual conflict available, though... For now, '''opposed''', but could make a well FA in the future. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 16:24, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
****''Any'' article can be a featured article, as long as it's good enough. The length of an article should not be considered here, it's about the quality of the writing, and of course all available information should be included. Since I don't remember the episodes referred to, Michael could be correst as far as I know in saying these references do not support "facts" written here. That should be checked by those who ''have'' seen the episodes. As last remark, I would suggest not using the two symbols of the powers involved in this conflict in such a fashion - IMO it looks rather akward. I don't think there are any images of the actual conflict available, though... For now, '''opposed''', but could make a well FA in the future. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 16:24, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
| |
*****Well, I respect your opinions. I will make any changes requested of the community, as I would like to see this article featured. Futher suggestions? [[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] 20:39, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT)Tyrant |
|
*****Well, I respect your opinions. I will make any changes requested of the community, as I would like to see this article featured. Futher suggestions? [[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] 20:39, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT)Tyrant |
| − |
|
|
| − |
* [[Cloaking device]]; Excellently written article, makes good use of images. Makes superb usage of available information, as well as duly noting inconsistancies. | [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 23:24, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
| − |
**I don't seem to miss any information. Good references, nice accompanying pictures, extensive write-up. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 16:27, 15 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
| − |
**'''Supported''' [[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] 17:10, 15 Feb 2005 (GMT)Tyrant |
|
| − |
**'''Supported''' - All the important points are there. Solid effort! -- [[User:Balok|Balok]] 18:36, 15 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
| − |
** '''Support.''' -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 00:53, 16 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
| − |
**'''Needs More'''. A few things come to mind that are missing, upon further review, such as references about [[chroniton]]s, and a passing reference to "[[Past Tense, Part I]]". Also, "[[The Die is Cast]]", "[[Let That Be Your Last Battlefield]]", "[[When the Bough Breaks]]" and "[[The Emissary]]" all contain useful references, or at the least, unexplored references to cloaks.--[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 17:48, 18 Feb 2005 (EST) |
|
| − |
***What does "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" say about cloaks? There is an invisible budget-saving ship, but it does not use a cloak. The info on that is already at [[stealth]], where it belongs. As for the others, I either haven't seen them ("Emissary", "Bough Breaks") or don't recall any relevance ("Past Tense" and "Die is Cast"). -- [[User:Steve Mollmann|Steve]] 21:01, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
| − |
:::: Just because you haven't watched an episode, does not mean it's information is void. For specific reasons, they all possess nuggets, or the seed to other areas or abilities yet unrevealed in said article. All I am saying is that more research is required. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 23:32, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT) |
|
