|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| |
*[[James T. Kirk]]: Well written and detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
|
*[[James T. Kirk]]: Well written and detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
| |
** Definitely support. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
|
** Definitely support. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
| − |
|
|
| − |
* [[Battle of the Omarion Nebula]]: This article is the result of a true joint effort between several registered and anonymous contributors. I think it does a great job of summarizing the events of the episode. (I did some minor copyediting on this article myself.) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 16:16, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**Before I vote, I would like someone to get those pics in a bit better. They are in a rather chaotic order right now. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 16:43, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
*** What the heck is wrong with the pictures, and why should their order affect your vote? I don't want to sound condescending, but that doesn't make sense to me. (No offense intended!) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 11:07, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
****Well excuse me, but I happen to feel a good, featurable article, has not only a well written body, but also a good appendix, references and pictures, all in a readable format. In this article, headers and pictures are crossing, creating a chaotic effect that effects the readability of this article. Since this only a minor fault and can easily be mended, I'm not voting against, but holding off my vote untill the pictures are resorted and the article IMO ready to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 14:09, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
***** Ohhhh, I see what you mean! Okay, I've fixed that myself. Sorry for causing confusion! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:33, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
****** There you go. Second. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 14:35, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**I don't want to sound petty, but I wrote almost all the text of the article's current version. Not to minimize other people's contributions but I put a lot of work into this and I'd like to be acknowledged for that. Aside from that, thanks for the nomination! -- [[User:EtaPiscium|EtaPiscium]] | [[User talk:EtaPiscium|Talk]] 15:01, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
*** My mistake, EtaPiscium! I was looking at the article's history page and neglected to check the diffs. Sorry about that! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 11:07, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**Supported. Good work! [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:24, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**seconded. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
*[[Ezri Dax]] -- Self-nomination. Having ''finally'' finished this article, I present it to be nominated as a feature article. Packed to the gills, this one is! I've detailed Ezri's involvement in every episode of [[DS9 Season 7]], which was quite substantial... -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 00:25, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**Seconded. Good work! --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 00:26, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
** Definitely support! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 02:16, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
** Definately supported. Though I would suggest making sub-titles in the article, so it's a little more clear... [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:10, 4 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**Support. Great work! -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 16:43, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
*[[Klingon]]: With the help of various people a detailed article has been created here. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 01:42, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST) |
|
| − |
**Enough information, not too long: Second. Although I would gather the various traditions and rituals spread throughout the article and put them together under a single header. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
|
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
| Line 35: |
Line 15: |
| |
**Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
|
**Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
| |
** I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
|
** I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
| |
+ |
** '''Holding''' this nomination pending support from Ottens. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 02:33, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
==Nominations with objections== |
|
==Nominations with objections== |
