Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

View source

Back to page

(Transporter: comment, leaning to support)
(Endgame: archived, <10 days, no consensus)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*'''Comment'''. I haven't gotten a chance to go through the nitty gritty stuff on the article yet (looks good), but I have noticed MA has a low participation rate on a lot of stuff, at least relative to its user population. --[[User:Broik|Broik]] 05:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Comment'''. I haven't gotten a chance to go through the nitty gritty stuff on the article yet (looks good), but I have noticed MA has a low participation rate on a lot of stuff, at least relative to its user population. --[[User:Broik|Broik]] 05:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
   
===[[Endgame]]===
+
I believe that [[Endgame]] should be a featured article. It contains discriptive information, good section divisions, and exceptional formatting. It also has a good list of famous quotes.
 
--[[User:Galaxy001|Galaxy001]] 03:12, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
* '''Comment'''. I don't think the connection between the Chakotay/Seven relationship and Enterprise/Nemesis is established - is there any at all? It should also be explained why the relationship would be out of place, as people such as myself who aren't familiar with Seven and Chakotay's prior interaction will wonder what the deal is. I would like to see some mention of a couple other things as well, namely the backlash from the episode (I haven't seen it but have heard it called the weakest finale quite often) and the questionably selfish motives Janeway has given the way she is so gung-ho about the Prime Directive and such. --[[User:Vedek Dukat|Vedek Dukat]] <sup> [[User talk:Vedek Dukat|<span style="color:red">Talk</span>]] | [[MemoryAlpha:User:Vedek Dukat/Episodes|<span style="color:gold;">Duty Roster</span>]]</sup> 03:43, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
* '''Conditional support'''. If someone pimps it out the way we saw happen with [[Emissary (episode)]] and [[Trials and Tribble-ations]] (e.g. going "all-out" with the background; see either of those pages for what I mean) I'd wholeheartedly support it. This is worthy a [[Wikipedia:Template:GA]] at least. [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] 14:48, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Comment'''. Yah, I see what you mean. I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Galaxy001|Galaxy001]] 05:38, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Mild support'''. Its a great article, theres nothing that stands out as needing improvement, but its nothing phenominal or unique. I geuss I will support this, but not that enthusiastically. [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 05:45, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 05:42, January 19, 2006

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

Transporter

I nominated, then pulled this nomination before on the suggestion that it go through peer-review. The participation there was low but I've done significant work on the article since then. For something that is mentioned or shown in practically every episode of every series I think this is about as complete as it can be. I've tried to organize it better, added quite bit of inormation to all the sections and some pics. I think it's pretty well written and reads well now, is thorough, and aside from my most recent changes for better organizaiton I think it's stable. For a vital piece of Trek I think we should give consideration to this nomination. Logan 5 15:47, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment. I haven't gotten a chance to go through the nitty gritty stuff on the article yet (looks good), but I have noticed MA has a low participation rate on a lot of stuff, at least relative to its user population. --Broik 05:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)


Nominations with objections

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki