Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

View source

Back to page

(The Collaborator: archived)
(archived Broken Bow, vote on Klingon history)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
 
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
 
===[[Klingon history]]===
 
After this was moved from [[Klingon Empire]] the original article will be de-featured because of the shrinking, but this one is still FA-worthy. --[[User:Memory|Memory]] 23:05, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
*'''Comment''' - The Future section needs episode citation. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 11:59, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
*'''Comment'''. I'd like to see some apocrypha because the Klingons have been featured in books, but otherwise it looks good. I cited the future part. [[User:Coke|Coke]] 21:04, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''. [[Klingon Empire]] was apparently featured on account of this section. Now that it has its own article, Klingon Empire looks like it will be de-listed, and I think this more than stands its ground as a separate, featured article. [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] 03:54, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
 
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
===[[Broken Bow]]===
+
===[[Klingon history]]===
+
*After this was moved from [[Klingon Empire]] the original article will be de-featured because of the shrinking, but this one is still FA-worthy. --[[User:Memory|Memory]] 23:05, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)
The episode summary is short and concise, while the Background Information section is very detailed. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 11:27, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
**'''Comment''' - The Future section needs episode citation. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 11:59, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
:'''Mild oppose'''. The summary is good but for a pilot episode there should be more background/continuity/ephemera that distinguishes this. "Emissary" and "These Are the Voyages" are examples of what I mean; they don't just have a detailed background but additional sections that make them FA worthy, this particular episode article doesn't appear more significant than a run of the mill episode when it certainly should. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 15:04, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
**'''Comment'''. I'd like to see some apocrypha because the Klingons have been featured in books, but otherwise it looks good. I cited the future part. [[User:Coke|Coke]] 21:04, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' for the moment, while the [[Talk:Broken Bow/peerreview|peer review]] is still running. Perhaps it would be best not to have both at the same time, but instead nominate an article here only ''after'' it has passed the review. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 21:51, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
*'''Support'''. [[Klingon Empire]] was apparently featured on account of this section. Now that it has its own article, Klingon Empire looks like it will be de-listed, and I think this more than stands its ground as a separate, featured article. [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] 03:54, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  +
*'''Oppose'''. In its former life it was incorporated into an article and now that it is no longer in that article, the page, as a stand alone, looks like it was just plopped into where it is at from another page, which is exactly what it was. The "introduction" to the article is ''non-existant'', and the first sentence regarding the [[Zanxthkolt Dynasty]] seems almost completely random for an intro to "early history". The "future" is just two listed facts and not really a competant future-- much less the fact that alternate timeline futures (from "[[The Vistor]]", "[[Endgame]]" and "[[All Good Things...]]" are absent. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 09:34, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:34, October 23, 2005

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Klingon history

  • After this was moved from Klingon Empire the original article will be de-featured because of the shrinking, but this one is still FA-worthy. --Memory 23:05, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment - The Future section needs episode citation. --Defiant | Talk 11:59, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment. I'd like to see some apocrypha because the Klingons have been featured in books, but otherwise it looks good. I cited the future part. Coke 21:04, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Klingon Empire was apparently featured on account of this section. Now that it has its own article, Klingon Empire looks like it will be de-listed, and I think this more than stands its ground as a separate, featured article. Weyoun 03:54, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. In its former life it was incorporated into an article and now that it is no longer in that article, the page, as a stand alone, looks like it was just plopped into where it is at from another page, which is exactly what it was. The "introduction" to the article is non-existant, and the first sentence regarding the Zanxthkolt Dynasty seems almost completely random for an intro to "early history". The "future" is just two listed facts and not really a competant future-- much less the fact that alternate timeline futures (from "The Vistor", "Endgame" and "All Good Things..." are absent. --Alan del Beccio 09:34, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki