Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

View source

Back to page

m
(-Weyoun, Yesterday's Enterprise, Galaxy class, Deep Space 9 (all successful nominations))
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.
 
Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.
   
===[[Weyoun]]===
+
''None currently.''
Self-nomination. A detailed article about one of my favorite DS9 characters. (Or does he count as five characters? :-D) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] 22:33, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] 22:57, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*No references yet, for the rest OK. I'll second it when it has references. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 16:20, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. It's a good article, but I would try to find a higher-quality image. ;) [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 19:55, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
 
===[[Yesterday's Enterprise]]===
 
Nominated mainly for its great summary of a great episode. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] 22:33, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Obviously second. :) -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] 22:36, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. Great work. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 19:55, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. Very well written. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 21:43, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
 
===[[Galaxy class]]===
 
Self-nomination. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 20:44, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
* Seconded. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] 17:01, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
* Seconded. Normally I look for references in articles, but in this case it might prove to be a bit superflous (pardon my spelling). But perhaps in the more obscure sections of info that only show up in one episode or so, it might be a good idea to have a reference. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 16:20, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
 
===[[Deep Space 9]]===
 
Self-nomination. A detailed article about the history of DS9, plus a description of its structure. It could probably use some minor additions for incidental facts and the like, but it's complete enough to deserve Featured Article status! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] 20:00, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
* Seconded. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 20:15, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
* Seconded. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 20:25, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
* Support. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] 22:57, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==
Line 10: Line 10:
 
===[[Earth]]===
 
===[[Earth]]===
 
Various people have contributed to this article and jointly created what i consider a very good overview of one of the most important locations in the Trek-universe. However, there are still numerous dead links among the cities and the orbital facilities. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 20:55, Jun 18, 2004 (CEST)
 
Various people have contributed to this article and jointly created what i consider a very good overview of one of the most important locations in the Trek-universe. However, there are still numerous dead links among the cities and the orbital facilities. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 20:55, Jun 18, 2004 (CEST)
:True, but in the explination itself there are almost no dead links (one). Only in the "reference list". I think this could make a good nominated article, though there might still be some info added. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 14:30, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)
+
*True, but in the explination itself there are almost no dead links (one). Only in the "reference list". I think this could make a good nominated article, though there might still be some info added. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 14:30, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. If this article is featured, the dead links will fill up themselves. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 15:49, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)
 
*Seconded. If this article is featured, the dead links will fill up themselves. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 15:49, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)
   

Revision as of 01:16, June 23, 2004

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.

None currently.

Nominations with objections

Earth

Various people have contributed to this article and jointly created what i consider a very good overview of one of the most important locations in the Trek-universe. However, there are still numerous dead links among the cities and the orbital facilities. --BlueMars 20:55, Jun 18, 2004 (CEST)

  • True, but in the explination itself there are almost no dead links (one). Only in the "reference list". I think this could make a good nominated article, though there might still be some info added. Ottens 14:30, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)
  • Seconded. If this article is featured, the dead links will fill up themselves. -- Redge 15:49, 22 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Warp drive

My congratulations go out to Chuckhoffmann, who clearly did his homework on this one. Some canon issues are still being worked out, but I'm confident that'll work out just fine. -- Redge 17:08, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)

  • Opposed. There are severe issues (mainly content, some style issues as well) still being discussed on that article's talk page. -- Cid Highwind 17:39, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Xindi War

Self-nomination. A detailed review of the final battles of the Xindi Conflict (2153-2154). Covers events from The Expanse to Zero Hour. -- 24.151.112.245

  • Opposed. It has the makings of a great article, but it needs some serious reworking to fit its focus. Additionally, the title really needs work. IMO "Xindi War" is wholly inappropriate for what it's covering. -- Dan Carlson 00:32, 12 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Doomsday machine

Self-nomination. A fairly long and detailed article about one of the best TOS episodes there was. -- Dan Carlson 17:01, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)

  • I disagree. This is a good article, but IMO misplaced. Read Talk:Doomsday machine. -- K 17:16, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
  • Seconded. Ottens 18:59, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)
  • Support. -- Michael Warren 22:57, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Klingon blade weapons

An exceptional detailed article on minor equipment. Ottens 10:01, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)

  • Opposed. That article should be split up, with one article for each of the different weapons. -- Dan Carlson 16:32, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
  • Oppose for same reasons. bat'leth, mek'leth and d'k tahg at least deserve their own entries. -- Michael Warren 22:57, 10 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Genesis Planet

A lengthy description that accurately covers the events surrounding this complex planet. -- Dan Carlson 17:56, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)

  • Seconded. Ottens 17:59, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)
  • Opposed. I don´t know. When I read the article, I got the disinct feeling that it was more or less a transcript of the movie, focussing on the Genesis planet. It isn´t so much as I´d sort that information for an encyclopdia. Take for instance the mention of the Genesis effect using protomatter and not being stable. It´s mentioned between two less important paragraphs. Maybe it just needs to be resorted a little. -- Redge 20:04, 9 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki