(→{{e|Melora}}) |
m (→Nominations without objections: Archived "Melora" nomination on article talk page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FeatNom}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
{{FeatNom}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
||
==Nominations without objections== |
==Nominations without objections== |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==={{e|Melora}}=== |
||
| − | [[Memory Alpha:Nominations for featured articles/Archive#Melora (episode) (April 27, 2011)|Take]] [[Forum:Inclusion of websites that collate viewer ratings|two]]. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 09:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''Support''' - This is an excellent article. The background information is comprehensive, well-written, and properly cited. It's also well-illustrated, which is always a plus.–[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 09:57, May 14, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 10:00, May 14, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. - I like the balance between the main article and bginfo and I can appreciate the use of multiple sources for the bginfo - [[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 10:10, May 14, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support''': I reckon there could be some more clarification in the summary (for example, a scene that contains two female characters currently refers to both as "she", etc., without referring to them more distinctly), but – other than that – this is a good effort. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 10:46, May 14, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. - Well written and researched. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 18:06, May 17, 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
||