(→Bell Riots) |
(→Nominations without objections: archiving successful nomination for Bell Riots) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FeatNom}} |
{{FeatNom}} |
||
==Nominations without objections== |
==Nominations without objections== |
||
| − | ===[[Bell Riots]]=== |
||
| − | * '''Self-nomination''' - The forth, and final push. Yes, it's short, but it's (still) a comprehensive article that thoroughly covers the subject, and we do have other FAs that are just as short, or shorter! - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 01:34, July 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support''' --[[User:Nero210|Nero210]] 20:58, July 7, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support''' --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 11:38, July 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support''' – [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 12:07, July 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support''' ,Short indeed doesn't necessarily means inadequate, but also this article has an increasingly uncomfortable relevance to our current predicament, a parable of caution if you will, itself alone worthy of nomination--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 22:48, July 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support'''.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 22:51, July 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support'''. IMO, it's covered at least as well as a "real" encyclopedia would cover a similar event in the real world--which is, after all, the standard that we're aiming for. -[[User:Mdettweiler|Mdettweiler]] 14:02, July 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | **'''Support'''.--[[User:Delta2373|Delta2373]] 09:53, July 15, 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
||