Wikia

Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article nominations

View source

Back to page

(Nominations with objections)
(-Good Shepherd, successful nomination)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*'''Support'''. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 13:58, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
*'''Support'''. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 13:58, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
** '''Support'''. — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 16:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
** '''Support'''. — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 16:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
* [[Good Shepherd]] - ''Self-nomination''. This is another episode article, but I think I covered all the information, and got some great pictures. I leave my fate unto you. -[[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 19:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support'''. Well done. [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 19:35, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**I would '''oppose''' the nomination due to low quality of some of the images, but I don't know if that counts. The rest of the article seems fine, and I would '''support''' the article if these nominations are judged solely on the text. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 19:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support'''. Images can be a matter for objection, however I think the ''quality'' of images is not a fair reason to oppose. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 21:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
*** I'm afraid back when I started doing this page, I hit "Refresh Page (Full Quality)", so when ever I go there they come up really nice quality pics, and I can't see how they normally look. Do you know a way to better their quality? -[[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 22:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**** I could upload similar images taken from the DVD, if you want. The quality would be slightly better then. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 22:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
** '''Oppose''' nomination - I've just learned that the article also needs full wiki formatting, there's still a section at the bottom of the page that needs to be formatted. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 22:29, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
*** Took care of that. I don't see how such an insignificant detail is a reason for objection, and I don't see why you couldn't take the 30 seconds yourself to fix it, but it's wiki-formatted now. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 14:36, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''', I've corrected most of the spelling and grammatical errors. Definitely a worthy candidate, IMHO. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 21:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
***'''Support'''. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 01:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''' [[User:AmdrBoltz|AmdrBoltz]] 18:45, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 02:37, June 23, 2005

Template:FeatNom

Nominations without objections

  • Boothby. Well written, plenty of detail for a minor charicter only mentioned a few times. AmdrBoltz 02:16, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Jaz 04:38, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. --Scimitar 13:58, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Support. — THOR 16:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

  • Force of Nature (self nomination) - After tidying it up a bit, I think that the article is as well-written and referenced as my write-ups on Relics and Timescape.--Scimitar 23:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Support AmdrBoltz 02:18, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Support, Wonderfully extensive. — THOR 16:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Oppose due to concerns about image use. The article itself is extremely well-written and I have no problems with that content, but some of the images seem unnecessary and don't add to the article, particularly this one, this one, this one, and this one. This image, this image, this image, this image, and perhaps this image as well should be cropped to only show the subjects of interest. And this image is quite definitely unneeded and should be replaced with something more useful--I think this image does a good job of providing a relevant introductory image and the main article wouldn't suffer from its loss. Otherwise, the article is definitely an excellent featured candidate. -- SmokeDetector47 // talk 19:17, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Support article, Oppose superflous images. The article is excellently written and very comprehensive, but I feel the images aren't really very useful. Several of the images just depict the characters, or situations which are not paticularly unique or especially circumstantial to the episode.
        • [1] is a useful image for the diagram shown behind Data which can be used on both the episode page and the Hekaras Corridor page (although, there already appears to be an image of the Corridor on its page: Image:HekarasCorridor.jpg).
        • [2] is a good image (and well used on both the episode page and the Subspace rift page).
        • [3] is also a good image for the diagram it provides.
        • I'm sitting on the fence on [4] about its usefulness. Otherwise it seems to me that the images on the episode page simply aren't significant enough to be uploaded for the sole purpose of being on the page. — THOR 20:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Star Trek: The Motion Picture (The Director's Edition) - Self-nomination. An article about the DVD version of the first Star Trek movie. --Defiant | Talk 10:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Oppose for now. While it is a very comprehensive article with respect to the features of the DVD, I believe it could be significantly expanded with information about how the project came to be, the work that went into planning and producing the DVD, and the difficulties in releasing it (the original release date was pushed back at least twice). -- SmokeDetector47 // talk 18:33, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki