(→Uphold: +TNG: Evolution) |
(rm 3, upheld) |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FAReview}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
{{FAReview}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
||
==Uphold== |
==Uphold== |
||
| − | === [[Nog]] === |
||
| − | [[File:Nog, 2375.jpg|thumb|Nog in 2375]] |
||
| − | '''[[Nog]]''' was a Ferengi, the son of Rom and Prinadora, and the nephew of Quark. He was the first Ferengi to enter Starfleet, and served aboard Deep Space 9 and the USS ''Defiant'' during many of the most important battles of the Dominion War. |
||
| − | |||
| − | Nog was a Ferengi male born as the only son of Rom and Prinadora. Rom had married Prinadora under a standard Ferengi five-year marriage contract, but was so blinded by love that he let Prinadora's father swindle him out of all of his money. Prinadora left Rom, and Rom was forced to raise Nog alone. |
||
| − | |||
| − | As a young Ferengi, Nog was required to memorize the Rules of Acquisition and study the philosophy of the Great Material Continuum. In time, he was expected to become a merchant and to acquire wealth like a good traditional Ferengi male. At some point during the latter years of the Cardassian Occupation of Bajor, Rom and Nog took up residence on Terok Nor and began work as waiters in Quark's bar. In 2369, Nog was still living on Terok Nor when the Cardassians withdrew.{{clear}} |
||
| − | ---- |
||
| − | The current version seems to be better than the featured one back in 2005. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 22:07, March 12, 2014 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support''', Agreed, especially organization of article has improved considerably--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] ([[User talk:Sennim|talk]]) 11:09, March 13, 2014 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. Seems to be a comprehensive article, though I would suggest the blurb be re-worded as the second paragraph reads like a repeat of the first. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 19:28, March 13, 2014 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ---- |
||
| − | ===[[Evolution (episode)]]=== |
||
| − | {{Blurb|Evolution (episode)}} |
||
| − | This article hasn't changed a whole lot since it was featured back in 2008 and I think it still holds up as a comprehensive episode article. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 20:52, March 13, 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Remove== |
==Remove== |
||
Revision as of 17:18, 19 April 2014
About → Policies and guidelines → FA policies → FA criteria → FA nominations → Featured articles → Featured article reviews Memory Alpha articles are never truly finished. Even featured articles, examples of Memory Alpha's best work, will over time have to undergo revisions to keep them up to date. Therefore, it's important to review the featured articles from time to time to ensure that these revisions have not only happened, but have maintained the quality expected of a featured article.
If you would like to help by starting a review, a good place to start is featured articles more than five years old, which are listed here. Please make sure you are familiar with the review policy before proceeding, though. For past reviews, please see the archive.
Reviews can be started by beginning a new discussion on this page. If you think that a featured articles' status should be upheld, add it to the "Uphold" section. If you think that the article should be removed from the feature article list, it should be added to the "Remove" section. Either way, be sure to state the reason(s) why you think the article should be reviewed. Reviews should display, and have a link to, the blurb used on the portals, by adding {{Blurb|ARTICLE}} before the discussion.
Sample format:
=== ARTICLE ===
{{Blurb|ARTICLE}}
<reasoning> - <signature>
Once this is done, a notice that the article's status is being reviewed should be added to the article in question by inserting {{far}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.
When you are commenting on a review, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the motion. When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".