Wikia

Memory Alpha

Memory Alpha:Featured article policies

Discuss19
37,512pages on
this wiki
Revision as of 04:21, March 11, 2014 by Archduk3 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelines → Featured article policies
Memory Alpha
This page describes one of Memory Alpha's policies and guidelines

Please read through the policy below to familiarize yourself with our common practices and rules.
If you have any questions, suggestions, or complaints, please post them on the talk page.

Featured articles are considered to be examples of Memory Alpha's best work and are showcased in the portals. They are especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive articles that cover all available information on a subject. As such, it is crucial that the following policies and guidelines concerning featured articles be observed - as they are intended to maintain adequate standards of quality for the list.

Nominations Edit

Nominating an article Edit

Featured article candidates are nominated on featured article nominations.

  • Any registered user that has been in existence for at least two weeks and with at least twenty significant contributions may nominate an article, one at a time. Before nominating a second article, the first one must be resolved.
  • Before nominating an article, make sure it fulfills the featured article criteria. Consider letting other editors copyedit or comment on the article to make sure that potential flaws are detected and eliminated.
  • It is allowed to nominate articles you worked on yourself, just make sure to mark any such nominations as a self-nomination.
  • If you nominate an article, you are expected to address valid objections that are raised.

Discussing nominations Edit

  • Any registered user that has been in existence for at least two weeks and with at least twenty significant contributions can participate in nominations. You should not vote on an article you nominated.
  • Be sure that you are familiar with the entire article before you form an opinion and vote. This is only fair to the writers of the article, as it's likely that several hours' work went into writing it!
  • If you approve of an article, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. The nomination of an article is considered a vote of support unless it's a self-nomination.
  • If you have any objections, write '''Oppose''' followed by your reasons. Any objections should be directly related to one or more of the featured article criteria. Objections purely based on personal preference are considered invalid.
  • If you want to comment without supporting or opposing, you may do so.
  • To withdraw a vote, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you wish to withdraw your nomination, you can do so at any time by writing '''Withdraw''' followed by your reason(s). Withdrawing a nomination removes any implicit support vote cast when nominating the article.
  • As always, sign your comments (~~~~). This is important to keep track of voting.

Resolving nominations Edit

A nomination can generally be resolved if it has been inactive for fourteen days, meaning that there were no new votes or work done to resolve objections in that time, or after a total of 6 weeks without any indication of resolution. The following results are possible:

  • Less than five votes, whether supporting or opposing: The nomination is considered unsuccessful and removed from the list.
  • Five or more votes with objections. The article is considered in dispute. Therefore, the nomination is unsuccessful and removed from the list.
  • Five or more votes without objections or with all objections resolved. The nomination is considered successful and removed from the list.
  • Withdrawn nominations can be resolved after at least three days unless another archivist "adopts" the nomination. The archivist adopting the nomination can not have another active nomination and is expected to address any valid objections that were raised. The original nominator may not nominate another article until the withdrawn nomination is resolved.

Any objections to the main page blurb are independent of the article, though a successful nomination can not end until 24 hours after all objections to the blurb are resolved. When a nomination discussion is resolved, it should be placed at the top of that article's talk page; with a link placed in the nomination archive.

Renominating an article Edit

If a nomination has been unsuccessful for whatever reason, the article may be suggested again after a waiting period of four weeks from the date of the initial rejection. Before re-nominating, any unresolved objections that were made during the initial nomination process should be addressed.

Reviews Edit

Featured articles can, and should, be brought up for review from time to time to ensure that they are still an example of Memory Alpha's best work. It is expected that these articles will have undergone revisions over time to keep them up to date, and it's important to make sure that these revisions have maintained the quality expected of a featured article.

Any featured article more than six months old can be listed on the featured article reviews page. If you feel the current revision of a feature article is just as good, or better, than the featured revision, it should be added to the "uphold" section on the discussion page. If you feel that an article currently listed as a featured article needs to be removed from the feature article list, for example because it has been significantly changed for the worst, it should be listed on the discussion page in the "remove" section. Either way, be sure to state the reason(s) why you think the article should be reviewed; then add the {{far}} template to the top of the article in question while leaving an edit summary informing other members that it was listed for review.

Review discussions Edit

  • Any registered user that has been in existence for at least two weeks and with at least twenty significant contributions can participate in review discussions.
  • An archivist may start more than one review, provided that the overall number of concurrent reviews doesn't exceed five.
  • Starting a review is considered a vote in support for the suggested course of action.
  • At least one additional vote is required.
  • Be sure that you are familiar with the entire article before you form an opinion and vote.
  • If you approve of the suggested action, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons.
  • If you have any objections, write '''Oppose''' followed by your reasons. Any objections should be directly related to one or more of the featured article criteria. Objections purely based on personal preference are considered invalid.
  • If you wish to request more time to make minor changes or read the article, write '''Hold''' followed by your reasons and how long you think you would need. Generally, holds should only be for a few days at most.
  • If you want to comment without supporting or opposing, you may do so.
  • To withdraw a vote, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • As always, sign your comments (~~~~). This is important to keep track of voting.

Frivolous reviews, for example ones that have nothing to do with the featured article criteria, may be removed by administrators without notice.

Resolving reviews Edit

The following results are possible:

  • If support to uphold the article's featured status during the review is unanimous, the current revision of the article becomes the featured revision after fourteen days. This should be done by updating the featured revision ID and date in the {{featured}} template at the bottom of the article.
  • If the majority of votes cast are for removal after fourteen days, the article will be removed from the featured article list.
  • Reviews with five or more unanimous votes, either to uphold or remove the article, can be resolved after seven days, though the fifth support vote must have been cast at least 24 hours before the review is resolved.
  • Reviews that do not have unanimous support to uphold the article, a majority to remove it from the feature article list, or two votes after fourteen days of inactivity are considered deadlocked, and the original revision will remain the featured one.

Any objections to the main page blurb are independent of the article, though a review to uphold a featured article can not end until 24 hours after all objections to the blurb are resolved. When a review is resolved, it should be placed with the nomination discussion on the article's talk page, and a link should be placed in the archive.

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki