(→Nominations without objections: Promenade successful) |
(→Nominations with objections: Jonathan Archer failed) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
||
| − | ===[[Jonathan Archer]]=== |
||
| − | Having just read this article, I think that it is very detailed, there are plenty of pictures to break up the text, everything looks really good. As one of the "main captains", it has to be detailed, and this has been done very well. [[User:Dvp7|Dave]] 01:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. I was just reading this article and thought the same thing. Very well written article. [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 01:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Conditional Support'''. Just want to know what still needs to be cited in the article- once that it resolved, I support this being a FA.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 23:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. I agree with those before me that this is a well written article and worthy of FA status – [[User:Melak|Melak]] 05:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | :*'''Comment''': Anyone else want to vote? [[User:Dvp7|Dave]] 07:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Support'''. I like this article and also the bunch of information in it. For the few "incite" pna's: Should be expanded. And maybe a gallery of his love interests would look good (?). But I think it should be a featured one. – [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 09:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Comment''' Well, I've done a quick once over (and found some odd grammar I corrected) and it looks pretty good, but the pictures IMO need to be changed. WAY too many "reaction" shots, in my opinion, the scourge of an encyclopedia like this one. I want to see him doing the stuff they talk about, not looking at the ground with a stern face considering what he'll have to do. - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJ Halliwell]] 16:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | :'''Oppose''' - Well, the article's ''long'' I'll give it that. But looking more closely at it its not "complete" at all. The relationship section barely touches on Shran, Forrest and Porthos, not to mention the many love interests. There are still sections that require citation, and as I said before, some of the pictures could use replacing. - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJ Halliwell]] 16:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:29, 8 August 2008
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
Dark Frontier
I would like to nominate the article VOY: "Dark Frontier" as it is extremely detailed. The summary is well written and complete, there are a decent amount of quotes and the background section has some interesting points. An all round excellent article, in my opinion. TrekFan 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)