Crimsondawn (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::As Cleanse stated, this current exception applies only to episode and film pages. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 15:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
::::As Cleanse stated, this current exception applies only to episode and film pages. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 15:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' - Looks impressively well documented. A minor suggestion for a later edit, perhaps also a listing of the production staff ? They have poured their heart into the episode and it is also due to their efforts that this episode is such a fan-favorite.--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 14:50, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' - Looks impressively well documented. A minor suggestion for a later edit, perhaps also a listing of the production staff ? They have poured their heart into the episode and it is also due to their efforts that this episode is such a fan-favorite.--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 14:50, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | *'''Support''' - Good summary and much relevant background information. – [[User:Crimsondawn|Crimsondawn]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crimsondawn|<span style="color:#00FF00;"> ''Talk yuh talk''</span>]]</sup> 21:29, May 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
Revision as of 21:29, 22 May 2010
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
In a Mirror, Darkly (episode)
- - was previously featured, but removed (on my recommendation) as the summary was found to be too long. The summary is now much shorter and there is a lot more background info, as I've thoroughly investigated the making of the episode. There is still also background info from a variety of other users, including writer Mike Sussman himself. --Defiant 12:36, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Support. - Archduk3 01:40, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Support restoration of status.--31dot 09:55, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - looking good! If only we had such great info on every episode. :-)– Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 11:05, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, two very minor points regarding background information. First, I think the first couple of notes need some kind of heading, and/or be moved under existing headings. Second, the third note under "Cast and characters" (putting the Ho back in Hoshi) should specify which DVD special feature. I'm guessing Inside the Mirror Episodes. ;-) – Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 11:18, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- I've added the requested info. But I don't understand how the heading "Background Information" can be capitalized, yet its subheadings not be(?) Surely, one or the other would be preferable! --Defiant 11:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Ha, I didn't note that inconsistency. Well, according to MA:MoS, headings should only have the first word and proper nouns capitalized. There's an exception for episode and film pages, but I've started a discussion about removing that; there's no real reason to differentiate ep/film pages from the rest of the wiki format-wise. I changed all the subheadings because that's what's been happening in practice.– Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 00:33, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- As per that policy, I've recapitalized the section headings. The headings can be uncapitalized, if your proposal is accepted by the community. --Defiant 11:07, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Ha, I didn't note that inconsistency. Well, according to MA:MoS, headings should only have the first word and proper nouns capitalized. There's an exception for episode and film pages, but I've started a discussion about removing that; there's no real reason to differentiate ep/film pages from the rest of the wiki format-wise. I changed all the subheadings because that's what's been happening in practice.– Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 00:33, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Is this a new guideline? When I started to submit my "Studio Model" articles a year ago, it was consistantly corrected to "Studio model". Personally I like the capitalization version better.--Sennim 12:42, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- As Cleanse stated, this current exception applies only to episode and film pages. --Defiant 15:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- I've added the requested info. But I don't understand how the heading "Background Information" can be capitalized, yet its subheadings not be(?) Surely, one or the other would be preferable! --Defiant 11:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Looks impressively well documented. A minor suggestion for a later edit, perhaps also a listing of the production staff ? They have poured their heart into the episode and it is also due to their efforts that this episode is such a fan-favorite.--Sennim 14:50, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Good summary and much relevant background information. – Crimsondawn Talk yuh talk 21:29, May 22, 2010 (UTC)