About → Policies and guidelines → Deletion policy → Images for deletion

Please make sure you have read and understood Memory Alpha's deletion policy before editing this page. But in case you don't remember, here's a digest version:

Images listed here will be removed after 7 days, unless voted otherwise. Make sure you add the deletion boilerplate message to images listed for deletion here. The one to use is {{delete image}}.

Add new entries at the bottom of the list, including a link to the image in question, and as always, sign entries with name and timestamp – use four tildes (~~~~). If an image has been replaced (or is a duplicate), ensure that you also link to that alternate image. Please remember to boldface (by surrounding bold text with '''three apostrophes''') so that your vote (keep, delete, neutral, replace or move) can be counted.

Please also note that Memory Alpha is not a file depository. Images and files that are uploaded here that are not directly related to an article, or are solely created for personal use, are subject to immediate deletion.

Unused imagesEdit

1. File:JLS4WLdisplayedcomparison.jpg - other image exists (here)
2. File:JLLOSTWave1WLBOPPack.jpg - other image exists (here)
3. File:JLLOSTWave3WLBorgPack.jpg - other image exists (here)
4. File:JLLOSTWave1WLD7Pack.jpg - other image exists (here)
5. File:Columbiajl.jpg - other image exists (here)
6. File:Playmates 1992 Enterprise-D.jpg - other image exists (here)
7. File:Playmates 1992 Shuttecraft.jpg - other image exists (here)

Unused images. 1-7 were already up for deletion and sulfur objected because he thought the format of the pages they would be used on should change, and thus the images would be used. If that's going to happen we should get on that; if not, the images can go. - Archduk3 18:04, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

I still feel that the pages in question should be split. At the moment, everything from the company to the specific collectibles is mashed into one big page. I feel that it would be more appropriate to separate those out. I also dislike the idea of mashing all of the images together into one big and hefty collage. Having said that, if it's determined that we're not going to bother splitting those pages and making them more useful, then so be it. -- sulfur (talk) 00:29, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Well I'm also interested in breaking these down as well, so it might be a good idea to create a forum post about this and place the split notices on the pages, since more discussion and details on how this would be done is required. - Archduk3 19:05, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Sulfur and prefer single images instead of collages. Tom (talk) 08:16, April 21, 2013 (UTC)