No edit summary |
Cid Highwind (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by SchwarzeGedanken (Talk); changed back to last version by Jörg) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Ten Forward Thread Nav}} |
||
− | With and Without. |
||
+ | Please '''vote for or against''' an addition of thumbnails to the episode lists on all series-articles: [[Star Trek: Enterprise]], [[Star Trek: The Original Series]], [[Star Trek: The Animated Series]], [[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]], [[Star Trek: Voyager]] |
||
− | I mean why don't we keep the list optional. |
||
+ | |||
− | Both factions will be satisfied. |
||
+ | The lists would look like this: [[http://memory-alpha.org/en/index.php?title=Template:TNG-Season1&oldid=440315]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Seconded.''' The thumbnails enormously alleviate searching for episodes and/or associating them. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 21:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | * '''We should.''' I already created them for TNG, only to have them removed in my absence. -- [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] <sup> [[User Talk:Jaz|<span style="color:#9900FF;">talk</span></sup>]][[Image:United Federation of Planets logo.png|27px]] 21:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | * I prefer the list '''without''' thumbs. The thumbs are not uniform size, they are too small to be usefull, and they spread out information that is more easily used close together. --[[User:Bp|Bp]] 21:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Without''' thumbs, for the reasons Bp said. In addition, when we had them (before Jaz went on vacation), the choices for the thumbs left much to be desired. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup> [[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span></sup>]] [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 22:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Without''' thumbs. They take forever to load, and they don't actually offer that much. And the uniform size thing. - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJ Halliwell]] 23:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Without.''' In addition to the reasons mentioned above, I don't think they really add anything to the pages (other than a bit of color). If we '''do''' have them, they need to be a uniform size and shape, though. -- [[User:Renegade54|Renegade54]] 23:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | * Wow, everyone above has pretty much covered all of my qualms about the issue. I guess all that's left to say is that I prefer the lists '''without''' thumbs. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 01:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | * '''With.''' The thumbs don't take long to load with broadband and help to instantly identify episodes along with adding aesthetic value. Choices and sizes are separate issues. -- [[User:StAkAr Karnak|StAkAr Karnak]] 02:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | **Nice little key word there, "''with broadband''". The majority of people still do not have broadband, including some of tha admins. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup> [[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span></sup>]] [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 02:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***Even with a non-broadband connection (ca. 10kbs) the images are loaded within a moderate time. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 20:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | * '''Without'''. After taking a look at the lists I must say, that I don't think they are of help, I'd rather have the more compact lists without images. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] 20:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ---- |
||
+ | |||
+ | ;4 FOR, 6 AGAINST |
Revision as of 22:08, 4 October 2006
Please vote for or against an addition of thumbnails to the episode lists on all series-articles: Star Trek: Enterprise, Star Trek: The Original Series, Star Trek: The Animated Series, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Star Trek: Voyager
The lists would look like this: [[1]]
- Seconded. The thumbnails enormously alleviate searching for episodes and/or associating them. --BlueMars 21:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- We should. I already created them for TNG, only to have them removed in my absence. -- Jaz talkFile:United Federation of Planets logo.png 21:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- I prefer the list without thumbs. The thumbs are not uniform size, they are too small to be usefull, and they spread out information that is more easily used close together. --Bp 21:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Without thumbs, for the reasons Bp said. In addition, when we had them (before Jaz went on vacation), the choices for the thumbs left much to be desired. --OuroborosCobra talk 22:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Without thumbs. They take forever to load, and they don't actually offer that much. And the uniform size thing. - AJ Halliwell 23:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Without. In addition to the reasons mentioned above, I don't think they really add anything to the pages (other than a bit of color). If we do have them, they need to be a uniform size and shape, though. -- Renegade54 23:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, everyone above has pretty much covered all of my qualms about the issue. I guess all that's left to say is that I prefer the lists without thumbs. --From Andoria with Love 01:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- With. The thumbs don't take long to load with broadband and help to instantly identify episodes along with adding aesthetic value. Choices and sizes are separate issues. -- StAkAr Karnak 02:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nice little key word there, "with broadband". The majority of people still do not have broadband, including some of tha admins. --OuroborosCobra talk 02:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Even with a non-broadband connection (ca. 10kbs) the images are loaded within a moderate time. --BlueMars 20:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nice little key word there, "with broadband". The majority of people still do not have broadband, including some of tha admins. --OuroborosCobra talk 02:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Without. After taking a look at the lists I must say, that I don't think they are of help, I'd rather have the more compact lists without images. --Jörg 20:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- 4 FOR, 6 AGAINST